Cal. Civ. Code § 958.2

Restriction on Commission Authority Over Pupil School Assignment

In Force
Verified 10/26/2026 · Next check 11/25/2026
effective 10/9/2026PennsylvaniaFair Housing & Anti-Discrimination

Operative Text

Cal. Civ. Code § 958.2
(a) It is the finding of the General Assembly that the neighborhood school is the cornerstone
of Pennsylvania's education policy on the assignment of pupils to public schools and
that the assignment of pupils to public schools is a matter that falls within the
special competence and expertise of education authorities, and it is the policy of
the General Assembly that this act shall not interfere with the neighborhood school
system or with the authority of education officials to provide for the assignment
of pupils to public schools unless such assignment is necessary to remedy a violation
of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United
States.
(b) Neither the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission nor any local human relations
commission nor any court, as part of its review of any commission or local commission
action or any complaint filed pursuant to this act, shall impose upon the Commonwealth,
any school district or other school entity, or any governing body, officer or employe
of any of the foregoing, any requirement that pupils be assigned to attend any public
school other than the school of appropriate grade level that the pupil qualifies to
attend closest to the student's home and shall not impose any other obligation or
responsibility with respect to pupil school assignment or pupil transportation related
to pupil assignment unless:
(1) imposing that requirement, obligation or responsibility upon such party is necessary
to remedy a specific violation by such party that would also constitute a violation
of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United
States; and
(2) a court would be permitted under decisional law to impose that requirement, obligation
or responsibility upon such party to remedy the specific violation of the Equal Protection
Clause of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
(c) Nothing in this section shall prohibit a school district from voluntarily continuing
or commencing a school integration plan within its territorial jurisdiction or from
assigning pupils for any appropriate reason within the scope of its authority under
the act of March 10, 1949 (P.L.30, No.14), known as the "Public School Code of 1949,"
or the act of August 9, 1963 (P.L.643, No.341), known as the "First Class City Public
Education Home Rule Act," including, but not limited to, the assignment of pupils
who request English as a second language to a school other than the school closest
to the pupil's home, if such instruction is unavailable at the closest school.
(8.2 added July 12, 1996, P.L.684, No.117)
Compiler's Note: Section 3 of Act 117 of 1996, which added section 8.2, provided that section 8.2 shall
not diminish or enlarge any powers or duties conferred by the act of March 10, 1949
(P.L.30, No.14), known as the Public School Code of 1949, or the act of August 19,
1963 (P.L.643, No.341), known as the First Class City Public Education Home Rule Act.
Section 4 of Act 117 of 1996 provided that section 8.2 shall apply to all matters
pending before the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission or before any court on
the effective date of Act 117.
Source: Legislative text reproduced verbatim
Plain English

Under 43 P.S. § 958.2, the Pennsylvania General Assembly has declared that pupil assignment to public schools is primarily an education matter, not a housing or human relations matter. The Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission, local human relations commissions, and courts reviewing commission actions are generally barred from ordering students to attend any school other than the closest appropriate-grade school to their home. The only exception arises when such a reassignment order is necessary to remedy a specific violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment and a court would independently be permitted under existing case law to impose that remedy. School districts retain the freedom to voluntarily pursue integration plans or make other pupil assignments within their existing legal authority.

Written by anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 · Reviewed on October 10, 2026

Plain English — not legal advice.

For Property Managers

Although 43 P.S. § 958.2 is primarily directed at education authorities and human relations commissions rather than landlords, property owners and managers should be aware that this provision limits the reach of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission into pupil school assignment decisions. Operators who manage housing in Pennsylvania should understand that complaints filed under the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act will not, by virtue of this section, result in commission-ordered changes to school attendance zones or pupil assignments. Compliant housing operators generally keep their fair housing obligations distinct from school assignment matters, recognizing that § 958.2 draws a clear boundary around the commission's authority in the education sphere.

General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.

For Tenants

Tenants in Pennsylvania should be aware that 43 P.S. § 958.2 limits the remedies available through the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission when it comes to public school pupil assignments. If a tenant believes a school assignment practice violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, that narrow constitutional claim may still be pursued, but the commission's authority to order reassignments is tightly constrained by this provision. Tenants seeking to understand how this intersects with fair housing or civil rights concerns may wish to consult a tenant-rights organization or legal aid office familiar with both housing law and education law in Pennsylvania.

General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.

Generated October 10, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.

Effective Timeline

Current
Oct 9, 2026
Click on timeline segments to view historical versions.

References Out

No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.

References In

No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.

Related Rules

§ 5.106
§ 5.106 Equal access in accordance with the individual's gender identity in community planning and development programs.
§ 5.109
§ 5.109 Equal participation of faith-based organizations in HUD programs and activities.
§ 2
Policies; recommendations

Source Information