ORS § 105 § 105.149
Hearing on compliance with order.
Operative Text
(1) Upon receipt of a timely filed request for hearing described in ORS 105.148, the clerk of the court: (a) Shall schedule a hearing on the defendant’s request as soon as practicable; (b) Shall notify both parties of the hearing date; (c) Shall mail or send by facsimile a copy of the defendant’s request to the plaintiff; and (d) May not issue a writ of execution of judgment of restitution pending the hearing. (2)(a) At the hearing, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this subsection, the court may consider only the following issues: (A) Whether the defendant complied with the order. (B) Whether the plaintiff complied with any requirement of the order that is a predicate to compliance by the defendant. (C) Whether the parties agreed to modify the order and complied with the modified order. (D) Whether one party unfairly prevented compliance by the other party. (b) If ORS chapter 90 applies to a dwelling unit, in addition to the issues described in paragraph (a) of this subsection, the court may consider the following issues: (A) Whether the stipulated agreement was entered into in good faith as required by ORS 90.130 or is unconscionable as described in ORS 90.135. (B) Whether, for a defendant whose noncompliance concerns performance or conduct, the noncompliance constitutes good cause for purposes of an applicable law or contract that requires the plaintiff to have good cause for terminating the tenancy. (C) Whether, for a defendant whose noncompliance concerns a failure to pay rent due for future rental periods pursuant to ORS 105.146 (2)(c), the defendant has claims against the plaintiff for moneys that offset the rent. The defendant’s claims must be pursuant to ORS chapter 90 or the rental agreement and must have arisen after the entry of the order. (c) The defendant may not raise defenses or claims involving issues other than issues described in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this subsection. (3) If the court finds in favor of the plaintiff after the hearing, the clerk may issue a writ of execution of judgment of restitution. If the defendant did not appear at the hearing, the clerk may issue the writ immediately. If the defendant did appear, the clerk may issue the writ no earlier than 24 hours after the court’s ruling. Further notice to the defendant is not required. (4) If the court finds in favor of the defendant after the hearing, the court shall set aside the judgment. The court may reinstate the order, terminate the order and enter a judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s action in favor of the defendant, enter a new order or schedule a trial on the plaintiff’s action as soon as practicable.
ORS § 105.149 establishes the procedural framework for a court hearing that takes place after a defendant (typically a tenant) files a timely request to contest compliance with a prior court order. The court clerk must promptly schedule the hearing, notify both parties, and hold off on issuing a writ of execution in the meantime. The hearing itself is narrowly focused: the court examines only whether each side complied with the order, whether compliance was prevented or modified by agreement, and—when Oregon's residential landlord-tenant law under ORS chapter 90 applies—additional issues such as good faith, unconscionability, and offsetting claims. Depending on the outcome, the court may either allow enforcement of the judgment or set it aside and choose from several remedies in the defendant's favor.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Under ORS § 105.149, once a tenant files a timely hearing request, a landlord (plaintiff) should expect to receive formal notice of the hearing date by mail or facsimile and should be prepared to demonstrate that they fulfilled any obligations the order placed on them as a precondition to the tenant's compliance. Compliant operators keep clear records of all communications, payments received, and any agreed modifications to the order, since the court's review is limited to those specific compliance issues. If the court rules in the landlord's favor, a writ of execution may be issued, though at least 24 hours must pass before it issues if the tenant appeared at the hearing.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
ORS § 105.149 gives tenants who have filed a timely hearing request under ORS 105.148 important procedural protections, including a pause on any writ of execution while the hearing is pending. At the hearing, a tenant can raise issues such as whether the landlord failed to meet a condition that was required before the tenant had to comply, whether the parties mutually modified the agreement, or—if ORS chapter 90 applies to the dwelling—whether the original stipulated agreement was entered in good faith or is unconscionable, and whether offsetting claims exist for future rent obligations. Tenants who believe these issues apply to their situation may benefit from contacting a local tenant-rights organization or legal aid office familiar with Oregon housing law to better understand the scope of arguments available under this provision.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated October 7, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
Rules and statutes cited by this regulation
References In
No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.
Related Rules
Source Information
Use this in your app
Access this data programmatically via our API