Cal. Civ. Code § 753

Stay in premises occupied for dwelling purposes

In Force
Verified 9/13/2026 · Next check 9/20/2026
effective 6/28/2019New YorkEviction & Just Cause

Operative Text

Cal. Civ. Code § 753
  § 753. Stay in premises occupied for dwelling purposes. 1. In a
proceeding to recover the possession of premises occupied for dwelling
purposes, other than a room or rooms in an hotel, lodging house, or
rooming house, the court, on application of the occupant, may stay the
issuance of a warrant and also stay any execution to collect the costs
of the proceeding for a period of not more than one year, if it appears
that the premises are used for dwelling purposes; that the application
is made in good faith; that the applicant cannot within the neighborhood
secure suitable premises similar to those occupied by the applicant and
that the applicant made due and reasonable efforts to secure such other
premises, or that by reason of other facts it would occasion extreme
hardship to the applicant or the applicant's family if the stay were not
granted. In determining whether refusal to grant a stay would occasion
extreme hardship, the court shall consider serious ill health,
significant exacerbation of an ongoing condition, a child's enrollment
in a local school, and any other extenuating life circumstances
affecting the ability of the applicant or the applicant's family to
relocate and maintain quality of life. The court shall consider any
substantial hardship the stay may impose on the landlord in determining
whether to grant the stay or in setting the length or other terms of the
stay. In an application brought outside a city of one million or more,
the term "neighborhood" shall be construed to mean (i) the same town,
village or city where the applicant now resides, or (ii) if the
applicant has school aged children residing with him or her,
"neighborhood" shall mean the school district where such children attend
or are eligible to attend.
  2. Such stay shall be granted and continue effective only upon the
condition that the person against whom the judgment is entered shall
make a deposit in court of the entire amount, or such installments
thereof from time to time as the court may direct, for the occupation of
the premises for the period of the stay, at the rate for which the
applicant was liable as rent for the month immediately prior to the
expiration of the applicant's term or tenancy, plus such additional
amount, if any, as the court may determine to be the difference between
such rent and the reasonable rent or value of the use and occupation of
the premises; such deposit may also include all rent unpaid by the
occupant prior to the period of the stay. The amount of such deposit
shall be determined by the court upon the application for the stay and
such determination shall be final and conclusive in respect to the
amount of such deposit, and the amount thereof shall be paid into court,
in such manner and in such installments, if any, as the court may
direct. A separate account shall be kept of the amount to the credit of
each proceeding, and all such payments shall be deposited in a bank or
trust company and shall be subject to the check of the clerk of the
court, if there be one, or otherwise of the court. The clerk of the
court, if there be one, and otherwise the court shall pay to the
landlord or the landlord's duly authorized agent, the amount of such
deposit in accordance with the terms of the stay or the further order of
the court.
  3. The provisions of this section shall not apply to a proceeding to
recover possession upon the ground that an occupant is holding over and
is objectionable if the landlord shall establish by competent evidence
to the satisfaction of the court that such occupant is objectionable.
  4. In the event that such proceeding is based upon a claim that the
tenant or lessee has breached a provision of the lease, the court shall
grant a thirty day stay of issuance of the warrant, during which time
the respondent may correct such breach.
  5. Any provision of a lease or other agreement whereby a lessee or
tenant waives any provision of this section shall be deemed against
public policy and void.
Source: Legislative text reproduced verbatim
Plain English

N.Y. Real Prop. Acts & Proc. Law § 753 gives a court the authority to pause—or "stay"—the enforcement of an eviction warrant in residential dwelling cases for up to one year when certain hardship conditions are met, such as the inability to find comparable nearby housing or extreme hardship to the occupant or their family. Courts weighing the request must consider factors like serious illness, a child's school enrollment, and any burden the delay would place on the landlord. The statute also requires a mandatory 30-day stay when the eviction is based on a lease breach, giving the occupant a window to correct the violation, and it voids any lease clause that attempts to strip a tenant of these protections.

Written by anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 · Reviewed on September 13, 2026

Plain English — not legal advice.

For Property Managers

Under N.Y. Real Prop. Acts & Proc. Law § 753, operators pursuing residential eviction proceedings should be aware that a court may impose a stay of up to one year on warrant issuance if the occupant demonstrates qualifying hardship or inability to find comparable housing in the neighborhood. Compliant operators generally document and present to the court any substantial hardship that a prolonged stay would impose on their property or business, since the statute expressly requires the court to weigh that burden when deciding whether to grant a stay and on what terms. When an eviction is grounded in a lease-breach claim, operators should anticipate a mandatory 30-day pause during which the occupant has the opportunity to cure the breach before a warrant may issue.

General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.

For Tenants

N.Y. Real Prop. Acts & Proc. Law § 753 provides residential tenants with the right to apply to the court for a stay of an eviction warrant—potentially for up to one year—by demonstrating good faith, an inability to find similar housing nearby, or that removal would cause extreme hardship to themselves or their family, with factors like serious illness or a child's school enrollment explicitly recognized. If the eviction is based on an alleged lease breach, § 753(4) entitles the occupant to a 30-day stay to correct that breach before a warrant can issue, and any lease provision purporting to waive these rights is unenforceable. Tenants who believe these protections apply to their situation may raise them directly in the eviction proceeding, consult a local tenant-rights organization, or seek information from a housing court self-help center.

General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.

Generated September 13, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.

Effective Timeline

Current
Jun 28, 2019
Click on timeline segments to view historical versions.

References Out

No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.

References In

No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.

Related Rules

§ 127G
Removal from district to superior or housing court; transmittal of rents and removal fees
§ 17
Occupancy constituting tenancy at will; termination
§ 17A
Residential care and services; housing facility providers; eviction; hearing; jurisdiction

Source Information

Snapshot SHA:
Fetched:Sep 13, 2026, 06:30 PM UTC