Cal. Civ. Code § 298

Judicial review and enforcement

In Force
Verified 9/13/2026 · Next check 9/20/2026
effective 1/8/2021New YorkFair Housing & Anti-Discrimination

Operative Text

Cal. Civ. Code § 298
  § 298. Judicial review and enforcement. Any complainant, respondent or
other person aggrieved by an order of the commissioner which is an order
after public hearing, a cease and desist order, an order awarding
damages, an order dismissing a complaint, or by an order of the division
which makes a final disposition of a complaint may obtain judicial
review thereof, and the division may obtain an order of court for its
enforcement and for the enforcement of any order of the commissioner
which has not been appealed to the court, in a proceeding as provided in
this section. Such proceeding shall be brought in the supreme court in
the county wherein the unlawful discriminatory practice which is the
subject of the order occurs or wherein any person required in the order
to cease and desist from an unlawful discriminatory practice or to take
other affirmative action resides or transacts business. Such proceeding
shall be initiated by the filing of a notice of petition and petition in
such court. Thereafter, at a time and in a manner to be specified by
rules of court, the division shall file with the court a written
transcript of the record of all prior proceedings. Upon the filing of a
notice of petition and petition, the court shall have jurisdiction of
the proceeding and of the questions determined therein, except that
where the order sought to be reviewed was made as a result of a public
hearing held pursuant to paragraph a of subdivision four of section two
hundred ninety-seven of this article, the court shall make an order
directing that the proceeding be transferred for disposition to the
appellate division of the supreme court in the judicial department
embracing the county in which the proceeding was commenced. The court
shall have power to grant such temporary relief or restraining order as
it deems just and proper, and to make and enter upon the pleadings,
testimony, and proceedings set forth in such transcript an order
enforcing, modifying, and enforcing as so modified, or setting aside in
whole or in part such order. No objection that has not been urged in
prior proceedings shall be considered by the court, unless the failure
or neglect to urge such objection shall be excused because of
extraordinary circumstances. Any party may move the court to remit the
case to the division in the interests of justice for the purpose of
adducing additional specified and material evidence and seeking findings
thereon, provided he or she shows reasonable grounds for the failure to
adduce such evidence in prior proceedings. The findings of facts on
which such order is based shall be conclusive if supported by sufficient
evidence on the record considered as a whole. All such proceedings shall
be heard and determined by the court and any appeal taken from its
judgment or order shall be reviewed by the appropriate appellate court
as expeditiously as possible and with lawful precedence over other
matters. The jurisdiction of the courts over these proceedings, as
provided for herein, shall be exclusive and their judgments and orders
shall be final, subject to appellate review in the same manner and form
and with the same effect as provided for appeals from a judgment in a
special proceeding. The division's copy of the testimony shall be
available at all reasonable times to all parties for examination without
cost and for the purposes of judicial review of such order. Any appeal
under this section and any proceeding, if instituted under article
seventy-eight of the civil practice law and rules to which the division
or the board is a party shall be heard on the record without requirement
of printing. The division may appear in court by one of its attorneys. A
proceeding under this section when instituted by any complainant,
respondent or other person aggrieved must be instituted within sixty
days after the service of such order. In cases of housing discrimination
only, a complaint dismissed after investigation for lack of jurisdiction
or lack of probable cause may either be appealed pursuant to this
section or the same cause of action may be filed in a court of
appropriate jurisdiction pursuant to section two hundred ninety-seven of
this article.
Source: Legislative text reproduced verbatim
Plain English

New York Executive Law § 298 establishes the process by which parties affected by a New York State Division of Human Rights (DHR) order — including orders after public hearing, cease-and-desist orders, damage awards, and complaint dismissals — may seek judicial review in state Supreme Court. The proceeding must be filed within sixty days of the order being served, and the court's review is generally limited to the record already developed before the DHR. In housing discrimination cases specifically, a complaint dismissed for lack of jurisdiction or probable cause may alternatively be refiled directly in court rather than appealed through this section.

Written by anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 · Reviewed on September 13, 2026

Plain English — not legal advice.

For Property Managers

Property owners or managers subject to a DHR order covered by N.Y. Exec. Law § 298 generally act promptly to track the sixty-day window from service of the order if they intend to seek judicial review in Supreme Court. A compliant operator keeps thorough records of all prior DHR proceedings, since the court's review is largely confined to that existing record and objections not raised earlier are typically not considered. Understanding which county's Supreme Court has venue — generally where the alleged discriminatory practice occurred or where the respondent does business — is part of navigating the process established under § 298.

General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.

For Tenants

Under N.Y. Exec. Law § 298, tenants who are complainants or otherwise aggrieved by a DHR order have the right to seek judicial review of that order in state Supreme Court, provided the proceeding is initiated within sixty days of being served with the order. In housing discrimination cases where a complaint was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction or probable cause, § 298 also preserves the option to file the same claim directly in a court of appropriate jurisdiction instead of pursuing the administrative appeal route. Tenants exploring these paths may benefit from consulting a tenant-rights organization or legal aid provider familiar with DHR procedures to understand which avenue fits their circumstances.

General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.

Generated September 13, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.

Effective Timeline

Current
Jan 8, 2021
Click on timeline segments to view historical versions.

References Out

No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.

References In

No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.

Related Rules

§ 100.110
§ 100.110 Discriminatory practices in residential real estate-related transactions.
§ 5.106
§ 5.106 Equal access in accordance with the individual's gender identity in community planning and development programs.
§ 100.140
§ 100.140 General rules.

Source Information

Snapshot SHA:
Fetched:Sep 13, 2026, 06:35 PM UTC