Cal. Civ. Code § 2

Legislative finding

In Force
Verified 9/13/2026 · Next check 9/20/2026
effective 6/28/2019New YorkRent Regulation

Operative Text

Cal. Civ. Code § 2
  § 2. Legislative finding. The legislature hereby finds and declares
that a serious public emergency continues to exist in the housing of a
considerable number of persons in the state of New York, that such
emergency necessitates the intervention of federal, state and local
government in order to prevent speculative, unwarranted and abnormal
increases in rents; that there continues to exist in many areas of the
state an acute shortage of housing accommodations caused by continued
high demand, attributable in part to new household formations and
decreased supply, in large measure attributable to reduced availability
of federal subsidies, and increased costs of construction and other
inflationary factors; that a substantial number of persons residing in
housing not presently subject to the provisions of this act or the
emergency housing rent control law or the local emergency housing rent
control act are being charged excessive and unwarranted rents and rent
increases; that preventive action by the legislature continues to be
imperative in order to prevent exaction of unjust, unreasonable and
oppressive rents and rental agreements and to forestall profiteering,
speculation and other disruptive practices tending to produce threats to
the public health, safety and general welfare; that in order to prevent
uncertainty, hardship and dislocation, the provisions of this act are
necessary and designed to protect the public health, safety and general
welfare; that the transition from regulation to a normal market of free
bargaining between landlord and tenant, while the ultimate objective of
state policy, must take place with due regard for such emergency; and
that the policy herein expressed shall be subject to determination of
the existence of a public emergency requiring the regulation of
residential rents within any city, town or village by the local
legislative body of such city, town or village.
Source: Legislative text reproduced verbatim
Plain English

Section 2 of New York's Emergency Tenant Protection Act sets out the legislature's formal rationale for the law's existence. It declares that a continuing housing emergency — driven by high demand, reduced federal subsidies, rising construction costs, and inflationary pressures — justifies state intervention to prevent excessive rent increases and speculative practices that threaten public health, safety, and welfare. The provision also establishes that local governments (cities, towns, or villages) have the authority to determine whether a public emergency exists within their own boundaries, which in turn triggers the law's rent-regulation protections in those localities.

Written by anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 · Reviewed on September 13, 2026

Plain English — not legal advice.

For Property Managers

ETPA § 2 is the foundational legislative-findings section that explains why New York's rent-regulation framework was enacted and why it continues to apply. Operators managing properties in jurisdictions that have adopted ETPA protections should understand that the law's reach is tied to a local legislative body's ongoing determination of a housing emergency — meaning the regulatory environment can shift as those determinations are revisited. Compliant operators generally stay informed about whether their city, town, or village has made or renewed such a finding, since that determination governs whether the rest of the ETPA's requirements apply to their units.

General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.

For Tenants

ETPA § 2 articulates the public-interest foundation underlying the rent protections that may apply to your housing. Because the section ties the law's activation to a local governing body's declaration of a housing emergency, tenants can look to whether their city, town, or village has made such a finding to understand whether ETPA-based protections are in effect where they live. Tenants who believe they are being charged excessive rents in a covered area may explore options such as raising an ETPA violation as a defense in a housing proceeding, filing a complaint with the applicable local rent board or agency, or reaching out to a tenant-rights organization for general information about how § 2's framework applies in their locality.

General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.

Generated September 13, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.

Effective Timeline

Current
Jun 28, 2019
Click on timeline segments to view historical versions.

References Out

No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.

References In

No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.

Related Rules

§ 326
Rules and regulations
§ 327
Saving clauses
§ 328
Effect of invalidity in part

Source Information

Snapshot SHA:
Fetched:Sep 13, 2026, 06:20 PM UTC