Nev. Rev. Stat. §§ 315.007–315.071 § 315.007
Availability of judicial review; requirements for retention of premises pending judicial review.
Operative Text
1. The decision of a housing authority to terminate a person’s housing assistance is a final decision for the purposes of judicial review. A person aggrieved by such a final decision of the housing authority is entitled to judicial review of the decision in the manner provided in NRS 233B.130 to 233B.150, inclusive, for the review of decisions of administrative agencies in contested cases. 2. If a person who seeks judicial review of a final decision of a housing authority pursuant to subsection 1 retains possession of the premises during the pendency of the action, the person shall pay the rent and comply with all other provisions set forth in the underlying contract for possession of the premises. If the person fails to pay such rent or comply with the other provisions of the contract, the landlord may initiate proceedings for eviction. If the person is evicted, the housing authority is not required to issue a new voucher for housing assistance to the person unless and until the person prevails in the action for judicial review. 3. As used in this section: (a) “Housing assistance” means any financial assistance that a person receives under the Housing Choice Voucher Program pursuant to section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, 42 U.S.C. § 1437f, and any regulations adopted pursuant thereto, or pursuant to any successor program. (b) “Housing authority” means a housing authority created pursuant to this chapter and includes, without limitation, the Nevada Rural Housing Authority. (c) “Landlord” has the meaning ascribed to it in NRS 315.021. (d) “Premises” has the meaning ascribed to it in NRS 315.021. Eviction of Tenants of Public Housing for Convictions of Laws Regulating Controlled Substances
Under Nev. Rev. Stat. §§ 315.007–315.071, when a housing authority terminates a person's Housing Choice Voucher (Section 8) assistance, that termination decision is treated as a final administrative action subject to judicial review under Nevada's Administrative Procedure Act (NRS 233B.130–233B.150). A person who challenges that decision in court and continues living in the rental unit during the legal proceedings must keep paying rent and abide by all other lease terms. If the person is evicted during the pendency of the case, the housing authority is not obligated to issue a new voucher unless and until the person wins the judicial review action.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Under Nev. Rev. Stat. §§ 315.007–315.071, operators who have a tenant contesting a housing authority's termination of Section 8 assistance should be aware that the tenant retains the right to remain in the unit during the court proceedings, provided the tenant continues paying rent and complying with the lease. If the tenant fails to meet those obligations—missing rent or violating lease terms—the provision expressly permits the landlord to initiate eviction proceedings. Compliant operators typically document any payment shortfalls or lease violations carefully, since an eviction during a pending judicial review affects whether the housing authority must reissue a voucher.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
Nev. Rev. Stat. §§ 315.007–315.071 gives Housing Choice Voucher holders whose assistance has been terminated the right to seek judicial review of that decision as a final administrative action, following the procedures in NRS 233B.130–233B.150. A tenant who pursues that review may remain in the rental unit during the case, but must continue paying rent and complying with all lease obligations to preserve that right. Tenants navigating this process may benefit from contacting a local tenant-rights organization or legal aid office to understand the procedural steps involved in challenging a housing authority's decision under this provision.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated September 22, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.
References In
No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.