Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-21,219 et seq. § 25-21,225
Forcible entry and detainer; continuance for more than seven days; undertaking required.
Operative Text
No continuance shall be granted for a longer period than seven days, unless upon cause shown to the court of the existence of extraordinary causes and then not unless the defendant applying therefor shall give an undertaking to the adverse party, with good and sufficient surety to be approved by the court, conditioned for the payment of any rents that have or may accrue, and any additional damages that may be sustained by such adverse party by reason of the continuance, if judgment be rendered against the defendant. A court should not grant an indefinite continuance in a forcible entry and detainer action, because doing so defeats the speedy nature of the remedy. Federal Nat. Mortgage Assn. v. Marcuzzo, 289 Neb. 301, 854 N.W.2d 774 (2014).
Under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-21,219 et seq. § 25-21,225, Nebraska courts are restricted from granting continuances longer than seven days in forcible entry and detainer (eviction) proceedings unless extraordinary circumstances are demonstrated. Even when such circumstances exist, the party requesting the delay must provide a court-approved financial guarantee—called an undertaking—covering any rent that accrues and any additional damages the other party suffers during the extended period. Nebraska's Supreme Court has reinforced that indefinite continuances are improper because they undermine the speedy-resolution purpose of this type of action.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-21,219 et seq. § 25-21,225 is designed to keep eviction proceedings moving quickly, which generally benefits a landlord seeking timely resolution. Operators familiar with this provision understand that if a tenant requests a continuance beyond seven days, the court must find extraordinary cause and require the tenant to post a financial undertaking to cover ongoing rent and potential damages. Landlords involved in forcible entry and detainer actions typically document accruing rent carefully so that any undertaking amount can be accurately assessed by the court.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-21,219 et seq. § 25-21,225 limits how long a court can delay an eviction hearing, but it also establishes a protective mechanism: if a tenant needs more than seven days, they may ask the court to find extraordinary cause and, if granted, must provide a surety-backed undertaking covering rent and potential damages. Tenants facing a forcible entry and detainer action may want to understand what qualifies as an extraordinary circumstance and what a court-approved undertaking entails before requesting a continuance. Consulting a tenant-rights organization or legal aid provider can help clarify these procedural options under this provision.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated October 5, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.
References In
No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.