Cal. Civ. Code § 441.800
Criminal prosecution unnecessary for certain eviction proceedings to begin — drug-related criminal conviction, effect on certain eviction proceedings
Operative Text
1. A civil action brought pursuant to sections 441.710 to 441.880 shall not be precluded even though a criminal prosecution involving the drug-related activity has not been commenced, will not be commenced, has not been concluded or has been concluded without a judgment of conviction. 2. If a criminal prosecution involving the drug-related criminal activity results in a criminal conviction the conviction shall collaterally estop the convicted defendant from challenging the essential allegations of the criminal offense in any subsequent civil proceeding brought pursuant to sections 441.710 to 441.880.
Missouri Revised Statutes § 441.800 establishes that a civil eviction action based on drug-related activity can proceed independently of any criminal case. A landlord does not need to wait for a criminal prosecution to begin, conclude, or result in a conviction before filing a civil action under the state's drug-related eviction statutes. Additionally, if a criminal conviction does result from the same drug-related conduct, that conviction prevents the convicted party from re-litigating the core facts of the offense in the subsequent civil eviction proceeding.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 441.800, property owners and managers pursuing drug-related evictions through the civil process established in sections 441.710 to 441.880 are not required to coordinate their timeline with any criminal prosecution. Compliant operators generally document the drug-related activity independently and proceed with the civil action on its own merits, regardless of whether criminal charges are pending, dropped, or unresolved. When a criminal conviction has been obtained, operators are generally aware that the conviction carries collateral estoppel effect, meaning the convicted party cannot contest the underlying facts of the offense in the civil proceeding.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 441.800 means that a tenant facing a civil eviction action under sections 441.710 to 441.880 cannot rely on the absence of a criminal prosecution—or its outcome—as a complete defense to the civil case. Tenants should be aware that if a criminal conviction has been entered for the drug-related conduct at issue, that conviction may limit the factual arguments available in the civil eviction proceeding through the doctrine of collateral estoppel. Tenants in this situation may wish to consult a tenant-rights organization or legal aid provider to understand what defenses remain available in the civil action.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated October 14, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
Rules and statutes cited by this regulation
References In
Rules and statutes that cite this regulation
Related Rules
Source Information
Use this in your app
Access this data programmatically via our API