Minn. Stat. § 504B § 504B.141

URBAN REAL ESTATE; HOLDING OVER.

In Force
Verified 9/15/2026 · Next check 9/22/2026
effective 9/15/2026MinnesotaRent Regulation

Operative Text

Minn. Stat. § 504B § 504B.141
When a tenant of urban real estate, or any interest therein, holds over and retains possession after expiration of the lease without the landlord's express agreement, no tenancy for any period other than the shortest interval between the times of payment of rent under the terms of the expired lease shall be implied.
Source: Legislative text reproduced verbatim
Plain English

Under Minn. Stat. § 504B.141, when a tenant of urban real estate continues to occupy a rental unit after the lease has expired—without the landlord's explicit consent to a new tenancy—the law limits any implied tenancy to the shortest rent-payment interval that existed under the expired lease. In other words, the holdover period does not automatically create a new long-term tenancy; instead, the implied arrangement is capped at the briefest recurring payment cycle (such as month-to-month or week-to-week) from the prior lease. This rule prevents an unintended renewal of a full lease term simply because the tenant remains in possession.

Written by anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 · Reviewed on September 15, 2026

Plain English — not legal advice.

For Property Managers

Under Minn. Stat. § 504B.141, operators of urban rental properties generally take care to document any post-lease occupancy arrangements in writing, because the statute limits an implied holdover tenancy to the shortest rent-payment interval of the expired lease rather than creating a new full-term tenancy. Compliant property managers typically communicate clearly and promptly with tenants whose leases are expiring, either confirming a new agreement or initiating appropriate holdover or eviction procedures. Relying on the statute's implied-tenancy cap does not substitute for an express written agreement when a landlord intends to establish new lease terms.

General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.

For Tenants

Minn. Stat. § 504B.141 provides that staying in a unit after a lease ends—without the landlord's express agreement—does not automatically lock either party into a new long-term lease; the implied tenancy is limited to the shortest payment interval from the expired lease. Tenants in this situation may want to understand what that interval means for notice requirements and potential liability before making housing decisions. Tenant-rights organizations and legal aid services in Minnesota can help explain how this provision interacts with other holdover and notice rules that may apply to a given rental situation.

General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.

Generated September 15, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.

Effective Timeline

Current
Sep 15, 2026
Click on timeline segments to view historical versions.

References Out

No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.

References In

No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.

Related Rules

§ 326
Rules and regulations
§ 327
Saving clauses
§ 328
Effect of invalidity in part

Source Information

Snapshot SHA:
Fetched:Sep 15, 2026, 07:48 PM UTC