Minn. Stat. § 484 § 484.013
HOUSING CALENDAR CONSOLIDATION PROGRAM.
Operative Text
Subdivision 1.Establishment. (a) A program is established in the Second and Fourth Judicial Districts to consolidate the hearing and determination of matters related to residential rental housing and to ensure continuity and consistency in the disposition of cases. (b) Outside the Second and Fourth Judicial Districts, a district court may establish the program described in paragraph (a) in counties that it specifies in the district. Subd. 2.Jurisdiction. The housing calendar program may consolidate the hearing and determination of all proceedings under chapter 504B; criminal and civil proceedings related to violations of any state, county or city health, safety, housing, building, fire prevention or housing maintenance code; escrow of rent proceedings; and actions for rent abatement. A proceeding under sections 504B.281 to 504B.371 may not be delayed because of the consolidation of matters under the housing calendar program. The program must provide for the consolidation of landlord-tenant damage actions and actions for rent at the request of either party. A court may not consolidate claims unless the plaintiff has met the applicable jurisdictional and procedural requirements for each cause of action. A request for consolidation of claims by the plaintiff does not require mandatory joinder of defendant's claims, and a defendant is not barred from raising those claims at another time or forum. Subd. 3.Referee. The chief judge of district court may appoint a referee for the housing calendar program. The referee must be learned in the law. The referee must be compensated according to the same scale used for other referees in the district court. Section 484.70, subdivision 6, does not apply to the housing calendar program. Subd. 4.Referee duties. The duties and powers of the referee in the housing calendar program are as follows: (1) to hear and report all matters within the jurisdiction of the housing calendar program and as may be directed to the referee by the chief judge; and (2) to recommend findings of fact, conclusions of law, temporary and interim orders, and final orders for judgment. All recommended orders and findings of the referee are subject to confirmation by a judge. Subd. 5.Transmittal of court file. Upon the conclusion of the hearing in each case, the referee shall transmit to the district court judge, the court file together with the referee's recommended findings and orders in writing. The recommended findings and orders of the referee become the findings and orders of the court when confirmed by the district court judge. The order of the court is proof of the confirmation. Subd. 6.Confirmation of referee orders. Review of a recommended order or finding of the referee by a district court judge may be had by notice served and filed within ten days of effective notice of the recommended order or finding. The notice of review must specify the grounds for the review and the specific provisions of the recommended findings or orders disputed, and the district court judge, upon receipt of the notice of review, shall set a time and place for the review hearing. Subd. 7.Procedures. The chief judge of the district must establish procedures for the implementation of the program, including designation of a location for the hearings. The chief judge may also appoint other staff as necessary for the program. Subd. 8. [Repealed, 2006 c 260 art 5 s 54]
Minnesota Statutes § 484.013 establishes a Housing Calendar Consolidation Program, currently operating as a formal program in the Second and Fourth Judicial Districts, with the option for other district courts to adopt it. The program brings together a wide range of housing-related legal matters — including landlord-tenant proceedings, rent escrow actions, rent abatement claims, and code violation cases — into a single, specialized court calendar. A referee learned in the law may be appointed to hear cases and recommend findings, but all recommended orders must be confirmed by a district court judge before they take effect.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Under Minn. Stat. § 484.013, landlords operating in districts that have adopted the Housing Calendar Consolidation Program may find that multiple housing-related proceedings — such as eviction actions, code violation matters, and damage claims — are handled on a unified court calendar. Operators generally keep thorough documentation of lease terms, maintenance records, and communications, since various claim types can be consolidated at either party's request. Being aware of the referee review process and the ten-day window for challenging recommended orders under Subdivision 6 is part of understanding how cases move through this specialized program.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
Minn. Stat. § 484.013 gives tenants the benefit of a consolidated court process where rent escrow, rent abatement, code violation, and eviction matters can all be addressed within the same housing calendar program. Importantly, Subdivision 2 specifies that eviction proceedings under sections 504B.281 to 504B.371 cannot be delayed simply because other matters are being consolidated, so tenants should be aware of the timelines involved. Tenants who receive a referee's recommended order have ten days under Subdivision 6 to file a notice of review specifying the disputed provisions; tenant-rights organizations in Minnesota can help explain what options are generally available within this process.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated September 30, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.
References In
No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.