Mass. Gen. Laws c. 186 § 25

Refusal of rental agreement or assistance based on termination of rental agreement under Sec. 24 or request for change of lock under Sec. 26 prohibited

In Force
Verified 10/26/2026 · Next check 11/2/2026
effective 9/13/2026MassachusettsVAWA & Survivor Protections

Operative Text

Mass. Gen. Laws c. 186 § 25
Section 25. An owner shall not refuse to enter into a rental agreement, nor shall a housing subsidy provider deny assistance, based on an applicant having terminated a rental agreement under section 24 or based upon an applicant having requested a change of locks under section 26.
Source: Legislative text reproduced verbatim
Plain English

Mass. Gen. Laws c. 186 § 25 establishes that a prior termination of a rental agreement under Section 24—a provision designed to protect domestic violence survivors—and a prior request for a lock change under Section 26 cannot be used as grounds to deny someone a new rental agreement or housing subsidy assistance. The rule applies to both private property owners and housing subsidy providers. In effect, it prevents these protective actions from becoming a mark against an applicant in the housing market.

Written by anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 · Reviewed on September 13, 2026

Plain English — not legal advice.

For Property Managers

Under Mass. Gen. Laws c. 186 § 25, compliant property owners screen applicants without treating a Section 24 lease termination or a Section 26 lock-change request as a disqualifying factor. Operators generally review their application criteria and any third-party screening tools to ensure those specific events are not weighted negatively in rental decisions. Awareness of this provision is relevant for anyone involved in setting or applying tenant-selection policies.

General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.

For Tenants

Mass. Gen. Laws c. 186 § 25 gives applicants a right not to be turned away from housing or denied subsidy assistance solely because they previously ended a lease under Section 24 or asked for a lock change under Section 26. If an applicant believes a denial was based on one of those protected actions, general enforcement paths include raising the violation with the relevant housing subsidy provider, filing a complaint with a state or local fair housing agency, or reaching out to a tenant-rights organization for guidance on available options.

General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.

Generated September 13, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.

Effective Timeline

Current
Sep 13, 2026
Click on timeline segments to view historical versions.

References Out

No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.

References In

No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.

Related Rules

§ 26
Change of locks upon request of tenant, co-tenant or household member believed to be under imminent threat of domestic violence, rape, sexual assault or stalking
§ 47a-7b
Request to change dwelling unit locks when tenant is named as a protected person in a protective or restraining order.
§ 534.604
Violation of ex parte order for unlawful occupancy of residential dwelling — arrest, when — penalty

Source Information

Snapshot SHA:
Fetched:Oct 26, 2026, 07:24 AM UTC