Cal. Civ. Code § 6
Review of commission's order; court order for enforcement; appeals; availability of commission's copy of testimony; limitations
Operative Text
Section 6. Any complainant, respondent or other person aggrieved by such order of the commission may obtain judicial review thereof, and the commission may obtain an order of court for its enforcement, in a proceeding as provided in this section. Such proceeding shall be brought in the superior court of the commonwealth within any county wherein the unlawful practice which is the subject of the commission's order occurs or wherein any person required in the order to cease and desist from an unlawful practice or to take other affirmative action resides or transacts business. Such proceeding shall be initiated by the filing of a petition in such court, together with a written transcript of the record upon the hearing before the commission, and issuance and service of an order of notice as in proceedings in equity. The court shall have power to grant such temporary relief or restraining order as it deems just and proper, and to make and enter upon the pleadings, testimony and proceedings set forth in such transcript an order or decree enforcing, modifying, and enforcing as so modified, or setting aside in whole or in part the order of the commission, with full power to issue injunctions against any respondent and to punish for contempt thereof. No objection that has not been urged before the commission shall be considered by the court, unless the failure or neglect to urge such objection shall be excused because of extraordinary circumstances. Any party may move the court to remit the case to the commission in the interests of justice for the purpose of adducing additional specified and material evidence and seeking findings thereon, provided he shows reasonable grounds for the failure to adduce such evidence before the commission. The order or decision of the commission shall be reviewed in accordance with the standards for review provided in paragraph (7) of section fourteen of chapter thirty A. All such proceedings shall be heard and determined by the court as expeditiously as possible and shall take precedence over all other matters before it, except matters of like nature. The jurisdiction of the superior court shall be exclusive and its final order or decree shall be subject to review by the supreme judicial court in the same manner and form and with the same effect as in appeals from a final order or decree in proceedings in equity. The commission's copy of the testimony shall be available at all reasonable times to all parties for examination without cost and for the purposes of judicial review of the order of the commission. The review shall be heard on the record without requirement of printing. The commission may appear in court by one of its attorneys. A proceeding under this section when instituted by any complainant, respondent or other person aggrieved must be instituted within thirty days after the service of the order of the commission.
Mass. Gen. Laws c. 151B § 6 establishes the process by which a commission order issued under the state's anti-discrimination law can be taken to court for review or enforcement. Any complainant, respondent, or other aggrieved party may petition the Superior Court to examine the commission's order, while the commission itself may seek a court order compelling compliance. The proceeding must be filed within thirty days of service of the commission's order, must be brought in the appropriate Superior Court, and is heard on the existing record rather than as a new trial. The Superior Court's final ruling can itself be appealed to the Supreme Judicial Court.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Under Mass. Gen. Laws c. 151B § 6, a respondent who disagrees with a commission order generally files a petition for judicial review in the Superior Court of the county where the alleged unlawful practice occurred or where the respondent does business, and does so within the thirty-day window after the order is served. Compliant operators typically ensure that any objections they intend to raise in court were first presented before the commission, since the statute limits the court's consideration of issues not previously raised there. Property owners and managers navigating this process commonly work with legal counsel familiar with administrative appeals and the review standards set out in Chapter 30A § 14(7).
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
Mass. Gen. Laws c. 151B § 6 gives complainants—including tenants who brought a discrimination complaint—the right to seek judicial review of a commission order they believe is inadequate, by filing a petition in Superior Court within thirty days of the order's service. The commission's copy of the hearing testimony is available for examination at no cost, which can be a useful resource when evaluating the record that the court will review. Tenants who believe a commission order does not fully address their situation may wish to consult a tenant-rights organization or legal aid provider to understand the procedural steps and deadlines that apply under this provision.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated September 13, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.
References In
No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.