Cal. Civ. Code § 6-842
Md. Code Ann., Environment Art. Title 6, Subtitle 8 — Lead Poisoning Prevention Program
Operative Text
(a) An offeror who fails to comply with the terms of a qualified offer, or who falsely certifies compliance under § 6-839(c) of this subtitle, shall be deemed to be out of compliance with the provisions of Part IV of this subtitle with respect to the person who is the subject of the qualified offer for purposes of § 6-836 of this subtitle. (b) The statute of limitations shall be tolled until the failure to comply under subsection (a) of this section is discovered.
Under Md. Code Ann., Env. §§ 6-801 to 6-852 § 6-842, an offeror who fails to follow through on a qualified offer—or who falsely certifies compliance with the related disclosure requirements—is treated as being out of compliance with Part IV of the subtitle for the person covered by that offer. This noncompliance status carries consequences under § 6-836, which governs enforcement rights. Notably, the statute of limitations for any resulting claim does not begin running until the failure to comply is actually discovered, meaning the window for legal action can extend well beyond the original event.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Property owners and managers operating under Maryland's lead paint provisions should be aware that Md. Code Ann., Env. §§ 6-801 to 6-852 § 6-842 treats both a broken qualified offer and a false certification of compliance as a formal compliance failure. Compliant operators generally ensure that any qualified offer they extend is fully honored and that all certifications submitted under § 6-839(c) accurately reflect actual conditions. Because the statute of limitations is tolled until the failure is discovered, the potential exposure period is open-ended rather than fixed from the date of the original transaction.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
Md. Code Ann., Env. §§ 6-801 to 6-852 § 6-842 provides important protections for individuals who were the subject of a qualified offer that was not honored, or where compliance was falsely certified. If such a failure is discovered, the tenant or affected person may still have legal recourse even years after the fact, because the statute of limitations does not start running until the noncompliance comes to light. Tenants who believe a qualified offer was mishandled may consider consulting a tenant-rights organization or legal aid provider to understand what remedies under § 6-836 might be available.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated October 12, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
Rules and statutes cited by this regulation
References In
No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.
Related Rules
Source Information
Use this in your app
Access this data programmatically via our API