Cal. Civ. Code § 33-34-3-3

Possessory actions

In Force
Verified 10/26/2026 · Next check 11/2/2026
effective 10/13/2026IndianaSummary Process

Operative Text

Cal. Civ. Code § 33-34-3-3
Sec. 3. The court has original and concurrent
jurisdiction with the circuit and superior courts in possessory actions
between landlord and tenant in which the past due rent at the time of
filing does not exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000). The court also
has original and concurrent jurisdiction with the circuit and superior
courts in actions for the possession of property where the value of the
property sought to be recovered does not exceed ten thousand dollars
($10,000). These jurisdictional limitations are not affected by interest
and attorney's fees.
Source: Legislative text reproduced verbatim
Plain English

Indiana Code §§ 33-28-3-4, 33-29-2-4, 33-31-2-3, 33-34-3-1, 33-34-3-3, and 33-34-3-4 establish that certain lower-level Indiana courts share authority with circuit and superior courts to hear landlord-tenant possession disputes when the past-due rent at the time of filing does not exceed $10,000, and property-recovery actions where the property's value does not exceed $10,000. Interest and attorney's fees do not count toward these dollar thresholds when determining whether a case falls within this shared jurisdiction. This means that qualifying possessory cases can be filed in more than one type of court, giving parties some flexibility in where a case is initiated.

Written by anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 · Reviewed on October 14, 2026

Plain English — not legal advice.

For Property Managers

Under Ind. Code §§ 33-28-3-4, 33-29-2-4, 33-31-2-3, 33-34-3-1, 33-34-3-3, and 33-34-3-4, a property owner or manager pursuing a possessory action—such as an eviction based on unpaid rent—generally has the option to file in a local or small-claims-level court rather than exclusively in a circuit or superior court, provided the past-due rent at filing does not exceed $10,000. Compliant operators typically assess the amount of past-due rent at the moment of filing to confirm the case falls within the applicable threshold. Because interest and attorney's fees are excluded from the threshold calculation, those amounts do not affect which courts are available for the action.

General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.

For Tenants

Tenants facing a possessory action governed by Ind. Code §§ 33-28-3-4, 33-29-2-4, 33-31-2-3, 33-34-3-1, 33-34-3-3, and 33-34-3-4 should be aware that a landlord may bring such a case in a lower-level court—not just a circuit or superior court—when the past-due rent claimed at filing is $10,000 or less. Understanding which court is handling a case matters because procedural rules and available remedies can differ by court type. Tenants who have questions about a pending possessory action or their rights in a particular court may find it helpful to consult a tenant-rights organization or legal aid provider familiar with Indiana housing law.

General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.

Generated October 14, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.

Effective Timeline

Current
Oct 13, 2026
Click on timeline segments to view historical versions.

References Out

No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.

References In

No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.

Related Rules

§ 1
Persons entitled to summary process
§ 3
Judgment and execution; costs; appeal
§ 5
Appeal; bond; actions thereon; waiver; appeal of waiver or periodic payments; notice of decision

Source Information

Snapshot SHA:
Fetched:Oct 13, 2026, 09:44 PM UTC