Cal. Civ. Code § 32-31-1-8
Notice to quit; when not necessary
Operative Text
Sec. 8. Notice is not required to terminate a lease in the following situations: (1) The landlord agrees to rent the premises to the tenant for a specified period of time. (2) The time for the determination of the tenancy is specified in the contract. (3) A tenant at will commits waste. (4) The tenant is a tenant at sufferance. (5) The express terms of the contract require the tenant to pay the rent in advance, and the tenant refuses or neglects to pay the rent in advance. (6) The landlord-tenant relationship does not exist.
Indiana Code § 32-31-1-8 identifies six circumstances under which a landlord is not required to give formal notice to quit before terminating a tenancy. These include fixed-term leases where the end date is already established in the agreement, situations where a tenant at will causes waste to the property, tenancies at sufferance, advance-rent arrangements where the tenant fails to pay, and cases where no landlord-tenant relationship legally exists. In these specific situations, the law treats the lease as terminable without the notice that would otherwise be required.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Under Ind. Code § 32-31-1-8, operators managing fixed-term leases generally do not need to issue a separate notice to quit when the lease term expires, since the end date is already contractually established. Landlords whose lease agreements require advance rent payment and whose tenants fail to meet that obligation also fall within the provision's notice exemptions. Compliant operators typically document the lease type, payment terms, and any waste or unauthorized occupancy carefully, as the applicability of each exemption depends on the specific contractual and factual circumstances.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
Ind. Code § 32-31-1-8 outlines situations where a landlord may claim that no formal notice to quit was required before seeking to end a tenancy, which can affect how quickly a tenant may need to respond to a termination action. Tenants who believe they have been wrongly classified under one of these exemptions — for example, disputing a claim of waste or the characterization of their tenancy as one at sufferance — may be able to raise that classification as a defense in any resulting eviction proceeding. Tenant-rights organizations and legal aid services can help individuals understand how this provision may apply to their particular lease type and circumstances.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated October 14, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.
References In
Rules and statutes that cite this regulation