Cal. Civ. Code § 32-30-8-15
Evidence
Operative Text
Sec. 15. In any action brought under this chapter: (1) evidence of the general reputation of the property is admissible to corroborate testimony based on personal knowledge or observation, or evidence seized during the execution of a search and seizure warrant, but is not sufficient to establish the existence of a nuisance under this chapter; and (2) evidence that the nuisance had been discontinued at the time of the filing of the complaint or at the time of the hearing does not bar the imposition of appropriate relief by the court under sections 10 through 14 of this chapter.
Indiana Code § 32-30-8-15 sets out two evidentiary rules that apply in nuisance actions brought under this chapter. First, evidence of a property's general reputation—such as community knowledge or hearsay about the location—can support other testimony or physical evidence gathered through a search warrant, but it cannot, on its own, prove that a legal nuisance exists. Second, the fact that a nuisance has stopped by the time a complaint is filed or a hearing is held does not automatically prevent a court from ordering remedies available under sections 10 through 14 of the chapter.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Under Ind. Code § 32-30-8-15, property owners and managers should understand that a property's general reputation in the community may be introduced in court to bolster other evidence, even if that reputation evidence alone is not enough to establish a nuisance. Critically, operators cannot avoid court-ordered relief simply by halting the offending activity before a complaint is filed or before a hearing takes place—courts retain authority to impose appropriate remedies regardless of timing. Compliant operators generally maintain documented records of corrective actions and ongoing property management practices to demonstrate good-faith efforts in any proceeding.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
Ind. Code § 32-30-8-15 provides important procedural protections for parties seeking to address nuisance conditions in residential settings. If a nuisance condition is reported or documented, the fact that a landlord or property owner stops the activity before a complaint is filed or a hearing occurs does not bar a court from still granting relief under sections 10 through 14 of the chapter. Tenants who believe nuisance conditions exist may consider documenting conditions through personal observation, exploring complaints through local housing or code enforcement channels, or consulting a tenant-rights organization to understand what evidence and remedies may be available.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated October 14, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.
References In
No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.