14 DCMR § 14-4303
RETALIATION
Operative Text
4303.1 A housing provider shall not take an action against a tenant, as provided in § 4303.2, with the intent to injure or get back at a tenant in response to the tenant’s exercise of any right conferred upon the tenant by law (“retaliatory intent”). 4303.2 Actions against a tenant that may be prohibited by § 4303.1 include, but are not limited to: (a) Any action or proceeding not otherwise permitted by law that seeks to recover possession of a rental unit; (b) Action that would unlawfully: (1) Increase rent; (2) Decrease or reduce the quality or quantity of services or facilities; (3) Increase the obligations of the tenant or constitute undue or unavoidable inconvenience in meeting an obligation; (4) Violate the privacy of the tenant; or (5) Harass the tenant; (c) Any refusal to honor a lease or rental agreement or any provision of a lease or rental agreement; (d) Refusal to renew a lease or rental agreement; (e) Termination of a tenancy without cause; or (f) Any other form of threat or coercion. 4303.3 There shall be a rebuttable presumption that an action against a tenant by a housing provider is taken with retaliatory intent if the action is taken within six (6) months following the tenant’s exercise of his or her legal rights in the following ways: (a) Making a request to the housing provider, either orally in the presence of a witness or in writing, to make repairs that are necessary to bring the housing accommodation or the rental unit the tenant occupies into compliance with the Housing Regulations; (b) Contacting appropriate officials of the District government, either orally in the presence of a witness or in writing, concerning existing violations of the Housing Regulations in the rental unit the tenant occupies or pertaining to the housing accommodation in which the rental unit is located, or reporting to the officials suspected violations that, if confirmed, would render the rental unit or housing accommodation in noncompliance with the Housing Regulations; (c) Legally withholding all or part of the tenant’s rent after having given a reasonable notice to the housing provider, either orally in the presence of a witness or in writing, of a violation of the Housing Regulations; (d) Organizing, being a member of, or being involved in any lawful activities pertaining to a tenant organization, as provided in § 4304; (e) Making an effort to secure or enforce any of the tenant’s rights under the tenant’s lease or contract with the housing provider; or (f) Bringing legal action against the housing provider. 4303.4 A presumption of retaliatory intent pursuant to § 4303.3 shall be rebutted only by the production of clear and convincing evidence by the housing provider that the action was taken without retaliatory intent. 4303.5 Where a housing provider is found to have violated § 4303.1, the Office of Administrative Hearings may order the housing provider, in addition to any other penalty prescribed by law, to cease and desist from taking such action, under such terms and conditions as the Office of Administrative Hearings may prescribe.
Under D.C. Mun. Regs. tit. 14 et seq. § 14-4303, housing providers in the District of Columbia are prohibited from taking adverse actions against tenants—such as raising rent, reducing services, refusing to renew a lease, or seeking eviction—when those actions are motivated by a desire to punish tenants for exercising their legal rights. The regulation establishes a rebuttable presumption of retaliatory intent when a housing provider acts against a tenant within six months of the tenant engaging in protected activities, such as requesting repairs, reporting code violations, or joining a tenant organization. A housing provider can overcome this presumption only by presenting clear and convincing evidence that the action was taken without retaliatory intent.
Plain English — not legal advice.
D.C. Mun. Regs. tit. 14 et seq. § 14-4303 requires housing providers to ensure that any adverse action taken against a tenant—including lease non-renewal, rent increases, or eviction proceedings—is grounded in legitimate, documented reasons unrelated to the tenant's protected activities. Compliant operators typically maintain thorough records that establish a non-retaliatory basis for any such actions, particularly when those actions occur within six months of a tenant filing a complaint or requesting repairs. The Office of Administrative Hearings may issue cease-and-desist orders against housing providers found to have violated this provision.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
D.C. Mun. Regs. tit. 14 et seq. § 14-4303 protects tenants from adverse actions—such as eviction, rent hikes, or reduced services—taken in response to exercising legal rights like reporting code violations or joining a tenant organization. If a housing provider acts against a tenant within six months of such protected activity, the law presumes retaliatory intent, shifting the burden to the housing provider to disprove it. Tenants who believe they have experienced retaliation may consider filing a complaint with District government officials, raising the violation as a defense in any related proceeding, or contacting a tenant-rights organization for guidance.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated October 13, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.
References In
Rules and statutes that cite this regulation
Related Rules
Source Information
Use this in your app
Access this data programmatically via our API