14 DCMR § 14-3922

INTERLOCUTORY APPEALS

In Force
Verified 10/26/2026 · Next check 11/2/2026
effective 12/3/2021District of ColumbiaRent Regulation

Operative Text

14 DCMR § 14-3922
3922.1 An interlocutory appeal is an appeal taken by a party prior to the issuance of a final decision and order by the Rent Administrator in a proceeding.

3922.2 An interlocutory appeal shall be permitted only if the Rent Administrator certifies the issue for review by the Commission on his or her own initiative or by motion of any party to a proceeding before the Rental Accommodations Division.

3922.3 A party seeking review by interlocutory appeal shall file a motion for certification within ten (10) days of a ruling by the Rent Administrator. The Rent Administrator shall rule on the motion within ten (10) days following the filing of the motion.

3922.4 The Rent Administrator shall certify an interlocutory appeal only if he or she determines that the issue presented is of such importance in a proceeding that it requires the immediate attention of the Commission, and only if the following are shown:

(a) The issue presented involves an important question of law or policy requiring interpretation of the Act or this title, and about which there is substantial basis for difference of opinion; and

(b) Either of the following applies:

(1) An immediate decision will materially advance the disposition of a petition, application, or complaint before the Rental Accommodations Division; or

(2) Refusal to make or issue an immediate ruling will cause undue harm to the parties or the public.

3922.5 If certification is denied, the ruling may be raised as part of an appeal of the final decision of the Rent Administrator or, if the case is later transferred to the Office of Administrative Hearings, the final decision of the Office of Administrative Hearing.
Source: Legislative text reproduced verbatim
Plain English

Under D.C. Mun. Regs. tit. 14 et seq. § 14-3922, an interlocutory appeal is a procedural mechanism that allows a party to seek review of a Rent Administrator's ruling before a final decision is issued in a proceeding. Such an appeal is only permitted when the Rent Administrator certifies the issue for review by the Rental Housing Commission, based on a finding that the question is legally or policy-significant, genuinely debatable, and either urgently affects the case's outcome or would cause undue harm if left unresolved. If certification is denied, the disputed ruling is not lost—it can still be raised as part of an appeal of the final decision, or through the Office of Administrative Hearings if the case is transferred there.

Written by anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 · Reviewed on October 13, 2026

Plain English — not legal advice.

For Property Managers

Property owners and managers involved in proceedings before the Rental Accommodations Division should be aware that D.C. Mun. Regs. tit. 14 et seq. § 14-3922 establishes a narrow window for challenging a Rent Administrator's ruling mid-proceeding. A compliant operator who believes a ruling raises a significant legal or policy question generally files a motion for certification within ten days of that ruling, clearly articulating why the issue meets the statutory criteria for immediate Commission review. Operators also maintain records of all rulings during a proceeding, since any issue denied certification can still be preserved and raised on appeal of the final decision.

General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.

For Tenants

Tenants who are parties to a proceeding before the Rental Accommodations Division may find D.C. Mun. Regs. tit. 14 et seq. § 14-3922 relevant if a Rent Administrator issues a ruling they believe is legally significant before the case concludes. The provision allows any party to move for certification of an interlocutory appeal within ten days of such a ruling, though the Rent Administrator must find the issue important enough to warrant immediate Commission attention. If certification is denied, tenants retain the right to raise that ruling as part of an appeal of the final decision, and tenant-rights organizations in the District can help explain how this procedural path works in practice.

General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.

Generated October 13, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.

Effective Timeline

Current
Dec 3, 2021
Click on timeline segments to view historical versions.

References Out

No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.

References In

Rules and statutes that cite this regulation

14 DCMR § 308
14 DCMR § 308
14 DCMR § 309
14 DCMR § 309.1
14 DCMR § 311
14 DCMR § 311.1
14 DCMR § 203
14 DCMR § 304
14 DCMR § 308.3
14 DCMR § 309.1

Related Rules

§ 151.21
HURRICANE KATRINA AND HURRICANE RITA TEMPORARY RELIEF PROGRAM
§ 5
Claim by foreclosing owner to set new use and occupancy rate
§ 2
Purpose

Source Information

Snapshot SHA:
Fetched:Oct 12, 2026, 09:02 PM UTC