D.C. Code tit. 16 § 16-1505
Conclusiveness of judgment.
Operative Text
A judgment of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia in a proceeding pursuant to this chapter is not a bar to any afteraction brought by either party, and does not conclude any question of title between them, where title is not pleaded by the defendants.
Under D.C. Code § 16-1501 et seq. § 16-1505, a Superior Court judgment in a summary possession (eviction) proceeding does not permanently bar either party from bringing a later, separate lawsuit on related matters. Additionally, such a judgment does not settle any underlying question of property title between the parties, as long as title was not formally raised as a defense in the original proceeding. In short, the outcome of an eviction case leaves open certain legal questions that may be litigated in a subsequent action.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Property owners and managers operating under D.C. Code § 16-1501 et seq. § 16-1505 should be aware that winning or losing a summary possession proceeding does not necessarily resolve all disputes with a tenant. A compliant operator typically keeps records of all proceedings and understands that a separate civil action on issues such as property title or damages may still be pursued by either side after the eviction case concludes. Consulting with a licensed D.C. attorney about the scope of any judgment is a common practice among operators navigating this provision.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
D.C. Code § 16-1501 et seq. § 16-1505 means that if you were a party to a Superior Court eviction proceeding, the judgment in that case does not necessarily close the door on future legal actions between you and your landlord. If questions of property title were not raised as a defense in the original proceeding, those questions remain open and could potentially be addressed in a later lawsuit. Tenants who believe they have unresolved claims after an eviction proceeding may wish to consult a tenant-rights organization or legal aid provider to understand what options may remain available.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated October 13, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.
References In
Rules and statutes that cite this regulation