Cal. Civ. Code § 38-12-1307

Retaliatory rent increase prohibited.

In Force
Verified 10/16/2026 · Next check 10/23/2026
effective 10/16/2026ColoradoRetaliation Protections

Operative Text

Cal. Civ. Code § 38-12-1307
A landlord
shall not increase a tenant's rent in a discriminatory, retaliatory, or
unconscionable manner to circumvent the requirements and prohibitions set forth
in this part 13.
Source: Legislative text reproduced verbatim
Plain English

Colorado Revised Statutes § 38-12-1307 prohibits landlords from raising a tenant's rent in a way that is discriminatory, retaliatory, or unconscionable when the purpose of that increase is to get around the protections established elsewhere in Part 13 of the same statute. In other words, a rent hike cannot be used as a tool to sidestep tenant-protection rules. The provision targets the motive and manner of the increase, not just its amount.

Written by anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 · Reviewed on October 16, 2026

Plain English — not legal advice.

For Property Managers

Under Colo. Rev. Stat. § 38-12-1307, property owners and managers are expected to ensure that any rent adjustment is grounded in legitimate, documented business reasons—such as market conditions, increased operating costs, or lease renewal terms—rather than as a response to a tenant exercising legal rights. Compliant operators typically maintain records that demonstrate the rationale behind rent changes and apply increases consistently across similarly situated tenants. Increases timed closely to a tenant's complaint or assertion of rights under Part 13 can draw scrutiny under this provision.

General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.

For Tenants

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 38-12-1307 gives tenants a basis to challenge a rent increase that appears designed to punish them for asserting rights or to work around the protections in Part 13. Tenants who believe a rent hike is retaliatory, discriminatory, or unconscionable in this way may have options such as raising the violation as a defense in an eviction or collection proceeding, filing a complaint with a relevant local or state housing authority, or consulting a tenant-rights organization familiar with Colorado law. Documenting the timeline between any protected activity and the rent increase notice is generally considered useful when pursuing any of these paths.

General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.

Generated October 16, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.

Effective Timeline

Current
Oct 16, 2026
Click on timeline segments to view historical versions.

References Out

No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.

References In

No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.

Related Rules

§ 2A
Reprisal for reporting violations of law, for tenant's union activity, or actions taken pursuant to laws protecting tenants who are victims of domestic violence, rape, sexual assault or stalking; defense; presumption
§ 47a-20
(Formerly Sec. 19-375a). Retaliatory action by landlord prohibited.
§ 47a-20a
Actions deemed not retaliatory.

Source Information

Snapshot SHA:
Fetched:Oct 16, 2026, 05:03 PM UTC