12 C.F.R. § 1002.6
§ 1002.6 Rules concerning evaluation of applications. (12 CFR Part 1002)
Operative Text
(a) General rule concerning use of information. Except as otherwise provided in the Act and this part, a creditor may consider any information obtained, so long as the information is not used to discriminate against an applicant on a prohibited basis. The Act does not provide that the “effects test” applies for determining whether there is discrimination in violation of the Act. (b) Specific rules concerning use of information. (1) Except as provided in the Act and this part, a creditor shall not take a prohibited basis into account in any system of evaluating the creditworthiness of applicants. (2) Age, receipt of public assistance. (i) Except as permitted in this paragraph, a creditor shall not take into account an applicant's age (provided that the applicant has the capacity to enter into a binding contract) or whether an applicant's income derives from any public assistance program. (ii) In an empirically derived, demonstrably and statistically sound, credit scoring system, a creditor may use an applicant's age as a predictive variable, provided that the age of an elderly applicant is not assigned a negative factor or value. (iii) In a judgmental system of evaluating creditworthiness, a creditor may consider an applicant's age or whether an applicant's income derives from any public assistance program only for the purpose of determining a pertinent element of creditworthiness. (iv) In any system of evaluating creditworthiness, a creditor may consider the age of an elderly applicant when such age is used to favor the elderly applicant in extending credit. (3) Childbearing, childrearing. In evaluating creditworthiness, a creditor shall not make assumptions or use aggregate statistics relating to the likelihood that any category of persons will bear or rear children or will, for that reason, receive diminished or interrupted income in the future. (4) Telephone listing. A creditor shall not take into account whether there is a telephone listing in the name of an applicant for consumer credit but may take into account whether there is a telephone in the applicant's residence. (5) Income. A creditor shall not discount or exclude from consideration the income of an applicant or the spouse of an applicant because of a prohibited basis or because the income is derived from part-time employment or is an annuity, pension, or other retirement benefit; a creditor may consider the amount and probable continuance of any income in evaluating an applicant's creditworthiness. When an applicant relies on alimony, child support, or separate maintenance payments in applying for credit, the creditor shall consider such payments as income to the extent that they are likely to be consistently made. (6) Credit history. To the extent that a creditor considers credit history in evaluating the creditworthiness of similarly qualified applicants for a similar type and amount of credit, in evaluating an applicant's creditworthiness a creditor shall consider: (i) The credit history, when available, of accounts designated as accounts that the applicant and the applicant's spouse are permitted to use or for which both are contractually liable; (ii) On the applicant's request, any information the applicant may present that tends to indicate the credit history being considered by the creditor does not accurately reflect the applicant's creditworthiness; and (iii) On the applicant's request, the credit history, when available, of any account reported in the name of the applicant's spouse or former spouse that the applicant can demonstrate accurately reflects the applicant's creditworthiness. (7) Immigration status. A creditor may consider the applicant's immigration status or status as a permanent resident of the United States, and any additional information that may be necessary to ascertain the creditor's rights and remedies regarding repayment. (8) Marital status. Except as otherwise permitted or required by law, a creditor shall evaluate married and unmarried applicants by the same standards; and in evaluating joint applicants, a creditor shall not treat applicants differently based on the existence, absence, or likelihood of a marital relationship between the parties. (9) Race, color, religion, national origin, sex. Except as otherwise permitted or required by law, a creditor shall not consider race, color, religion, national origin, or sex (or an applicant's or other person's decision not to provide the information) in any aspect of a credit transaction. (c) State property laws. A creditor's consideration or application of state property laws directly or indirectly affecting creditworthiness does not constitute unlawful discrimination for the purposes of the Act or this part.
Under 12 CFR Part 1002 § 1002.6, creditors are broadly permitted to use information in evaluating credit applications, but they are prohibited from using that information to discriminate on protected bases such as race, sex, religion, national origin, marital status, age (with narrow exceptions), or receipt of public assistance. The rule sets out specific guardrails for particular data types — for example, income from part-time work, pensions, or alimony cannot be automatically discounted, and assumptions about childbearing cannot factor into creditworthiness assessments. Certain limited exceptions exist, such as allowing age to be used in statistically validated credit scoring systems as long as elderly applicants are not penalized, and permitting consideration of immigration status to the extent necessary to understand repayment rights.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Property owners and managers who extend credit — such as when offering seller financing or evaluating rental applicants under credit-based screening — should be aware that 12 CFR Part 1002 § 1002.6 governs how application information may be used. Compliant operators generally apply consistent evaluation standards regardless of an applicant's marital status, avoid making assumptions about future income interruptions tied to childbearing, and ensure that income from part-time work, annuities, or public assistance programs is not automatically excluded from consideration. Operators who use credit scoring systems typically verify that any age-based variables in those systems do not assign negative values to elderly applicants, and they document that their evaluation criteria are applied uniformly across similarly situated applicants.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
Under 12 CFR Part 1002 § 1002.6, applicants have the right to be evaluated without discrimination based on protected characteristics, and they may request that a creditor consider credit history from joint or spousal accounts — or present evidence that the credit history on file does not accurately reflect their actual creditworthiness. If an applicant believes a creditor has violated these rules — for instance, by discounting income from a pension, making assumptions about childbearing, or applying different standards based on marital status — that applicant may file a complaint with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) or a relevant federal supervisory agency. Tenant-rights organizations and housing counseling agencies can help applicants understand how § 1002.6 protections may apply to their situation and what documentation might be relevant to a complaint.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated September 4, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.
References In
No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.