12 C.F.R. § 1002.11

§ 1002.11 Relation to state law. (12 CFR Part 1002)

In Force
Verified 8/21/2026 · Next check 9/20/2026
effective 8/21/2026FederalAffordable Housing Programs

Operative Text

12 C.F.R. § 1002.11
(a) Inconsistent state laws. Except as otherwise provided in this section, this part alters, affects, or preempts only those state laws that are inconsistent with the Act and this part and then only to the extent of the inconsistency. A state law is not inconsistent if it is more protective of an applicant.

(b) Preempted provisions of state law. (1) A state law is deemed to be inconsistent with the requirements of the Act and this part and less protective of an applicant within the meaning of section 705(f) of the Act to the extent that the law:

(i) Requires or permits a practice or act prohibited by the Act or this part;

(ii) Prohibits the individual extension of consumer credit to both parties to a marriage if each spouse individually and voluntarily applies for such credit;

(iii) Prohibits inquiries or collection of data required to comply with the Act or this part;

(iv) Prohibits asking about or considering age in an empirically derived, demonstrably and statistically sound, credit scoring system to determine a pertinent element of creditworthiness, or to favor an elderly applicant; or

(v) Prohibits inquiries necessary to establish or administer a special purpose credit program as defined by § 1002.8.

(2) A creditor, state, or other interested party may request that the Bureau determine whether a state law is inconsistent with the requirements of the Act and this part.

(c) Laws on finance charges, loan ceilings. If married applicants voluntarily apply for and obtain individual accounts with the same creditor, the accounts shall not be aggregated or otherwise combined for purposes of determining permissible finance charges or loan ceilings under any Federal or state law. Permissible loan ceiling laws shall be construed to permit each spouse to become individually liable up to the amount of the loan ceilings, less the amount for which the applicant is jointly liable.

(d) State and Federal laws not affected. This section does not alter or annul any provision of state property laws, laws relating to the disposition of decedents' estates, or Federal or state banking regulations directed only toward insuring the solvency of financial institutions.

(e) Exemption for state-regulated transactions—(1) Applications. A state may apply to the Bureau for an exemption from the requirements of the Act and this part for any class of credit transactions within the state. The Bureau will grant such an exemption if the Bureau determines that:

(i) The class of credit transactions is subject to state law requirements substantially similar to those of the Act and this part or that applicants are afforded greater protection under state law; and

(ii) There is adequate provision for state enforcement.

(2) Liability and enforcement. (i) No exemption will extend to the civil liability provisions of section 706 of the Act or the administrative enforcement provisions of section 704 of the Act.

(ii) After an exemption has been granted, the requirements of the applicable state law (except for additional requirements not imposed by Federal law) will constitute the requirements of the Act and this part.
Source: Legislative text reproduced verbatim
Plain English

Section 1002.11 of 12 CFR Part 1002 establishes the relationship between federal equal credit opportunity rules and state laws. Federal rules only override state credit laws to the extent those state laws conflict with federal requirements — and a state law is never considered inconsistent if it offers applicants stronger protections than the federal standard. Certain specific state law provisions are deemed preempted, such as those that would block voluntary individual credit applications by married spouses or prohibit data collection required by federal law. States may also seek a formal exemption from the Bureau, allowing state law to effectively stand in for federal requirements if the state's protections are substantially similar or stronger and enforcement is adequate.

Written by anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 · Reviewed on September 4, 2026

Plain English — not legal advice.

For Property Managers

While § 1002.11 is primarily directed at creditors rather than landlords, property owners who extend credit — such as through seller financing or rent-to-own arrangements — should be aware that this provision governs how federal and state fair credit rules interact. A compliant operator generally ensures that credit-related practices meet whichever standard, state or federal, affords the applicant greater protection, rather than defaulting to the less protective of the two. Operators in states that have received a Bureau exemption under § 1002.11(e) should familiarize themselves with the applicable state law requirements, which in those jurisdictions effectively carry the force of federal law.

General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.

For Tenants

Under § 1002.11, applicants for credit — including housing-related credit — benefit from whichever set of rules, state or federal, provides the greater protection. If a creditor's practice appears to violate either federal requirements or a more protective state law, a tenant or applicant may have grounds to raise that violation, file a complaint with the relevant state enforcement agency or federal regulator, or consult a tenant-rights or consumer-rights organization familiar with how § 1002.11 applies in their state. In states that have obtained a Bureau exemption under § 1002.11(e), state law requirements generally govern, though civil liability and administrative enforcement rights under the federal Act are never waived by an exemption.

General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.

Generated September 4, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.

Effective Timeline

Current
Aug 21, 2026
Click on timeline segments to view historical versions.

References Out

No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.

References In

No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.

Related Rules

§ 1437
Declaration of policy and public housing agency organization
§ 5.100
§ 5.100 Definitions.
§ 5.107
§ 5.107 Audit requirements for non-profit organizations.

Source Information

Snapshot SHA:
Fetched:Aug 21, 2026, 01:26 PM UTC