Ithaca, N.Y., Code of Ordinances ch. 210 § 210-3
Conflicts with other provisions; highest standards to prevail
Operative Text
A. The provisions of this Part 1 shall supersede local laws, ordinances, codes or regulations to the extent that such laws, ordinances, codes or regulations are inconsistent with the provisions of this Part 1 , provided that nothing herein contained shall be construed to prevent the adoption and enforcement of a law, ordinance, code or regulation which is more restrictive or establishes a higher standard than that provided in this Part 1 , and such more-restrictive requirement or higher standard shall govern during the period in which it is in effect. B. Where a provision of this Part 1 is found to be in conflict with a provision of a zoning, building, electrical, plumbing, fire, safety, health, water supply or sewage disposal law or ordinance or regulation adopted pursuant thereto or other local law, ordinance, code or regulation, the provision or requirement which is the more restrictive or which establishes the higher standard shall prevail.
Section 210-3 of Ithaca's Code of Ordinances, Chapter 210, establishes a hierarchy for resolving conflicts between Part 1's housing provisions and other local laws. When Part 1 conflicts with another local rule—whether a zoning, building, fire, health, or similar code—the more restrictive requirement or higher standard automatically takes precedence. This means that Part 1 does not override stricter local protections; instead, whichever rule demands more of a property owner or offers greater protection will govern.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Under § 210-3, property owners and managers operating in Ithaca must identify and comply with whichever applicable standard is most restrictive when Part 1 of Chapter 210 overlaps with other local codes such as zoning, building, plumbing, or fire regulations. Compliant operators generally audit their properties against all potentially applicable local rules—not just Part 1—to ensure they are meeting the highest applicable standard in each area. Awareness of this conflict-resolution rule helps operators avoid assuming that satisfying Part 1 alone is sufficient when a stricter local requirement is also in effect.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
Section 210-3 of Ithaca's Chapter 210 means that tenants may benefit from whichever local rule—whether Part 1 or another applicable code—provides the stronger protection or sets the higher standard. If a landlord claims compliance with Part 1 while a stricter zoning, health, or safety ordinance also applies, that stricter rule still governs. Tenants who believe a more protective local standard is being ignored can raise this provision as a basis for a complaint with the relevant local enforcement authority or seek guidance from a tenant-rights organization familiar with Ithaca's local codes.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated November 7, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.
References In
No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.