Farmingdale, N.Y., Code of Ordinances ch. 437 (eCode360 ed. 2026) § 437-2
Rebuttable presumptions
Operative Text
A. In all civil and criminal prosecutions brought for the enforcement of chapter provisions in respect to nonpermitted occupancy of residential dwellings, the following rebuttable presumptions shall apply: (1) That any dwelling which maintains more than one gas meter or more than one electric meter or more than one water meter is being used as the residence of two or more families. (2) That any dwelling which maintains more than two gas meters or more than two electric meters or more than two water meters is being used as the residence of three or more families. (3) That a one-family dwelling which maintains any entrance(s) thereto, which entrance(s) has not been set forth on any plans approved by and on file with the Department of Buildings, is being used as the residence of two or more families. (4) That a two-family dwelling which maintains any third or additional entrance thereto, which entrance(s) has not been set forth on any plans approved by and on file with the Department of Buildings, is being used as the residence of three or more families. (5) That a dwelling which has been advertised in any newspapers, magazine or local advertising publication as being available for sale or rent, which advertisement expressly or implicitly provides that such dwelling contains rooms for rent, more than one separate dwelling living unit, or may be occupied by more than one separate family, is being used as a dwelling containing the number of rooms for rent, dwelling units or families stated or implied in such advertisement. (6) That if there exists two or more doorbells or mailboxes, such would indicate two or more families are residing in the dwelling. (7) That if there are two or more motor vehicles parked on the dwelling lot registered to persons with two or more different surnames, such would indicate two or more families residing in the dwelling. (8) The presumption of nonpermitted occupancy of a single dwelling unit shall also be established where probative evidence establishes: (a) That there exists permanent partitions or internal doors which may serve to bar access between segregated portions of the dwelling, including but not limited to bedrooms, or the inability of any occupant or person in possession thereof to have unimpeded and/or lawful access to all parts of the dwelling unit. (b) That there exists two or more kitchens each containing one or more of the following: a range, oven, hot plate, microwave, or other similar device customarily used for cooking or preparation of foods. (c) There exists more than the permitted number of bathrooms. For purposes of the illegal occupancy presumption: [1] No more than two bathrooms shall be permitted in any single-family dwelling; except that for single-family dwellings in excess of two bedrooms, an additional 1/2 bath for each additional bedroom in excess of two bedrooms shall be permitted. [2] No more than three bathrooms shall be permitted in any two-family dwelling; except that for two-family dwellings in excess of three bedrooms an additional 1/2 bath for each additional bedroom in excess of three bedrooms shall be permitted. B. The presumption raised by proof of the existence of any such conditions as set forth in Subsection A herein may only be rebutted by conclusive evidence that such conditions do not, in fact, exist or that such conditions, in fact, comply with this chapter. C. A person charged with a violation of this chapter as described herein may demand an inspection by the Department of Buildings of the subject premises to rebut such presumption. Such demand shall be in writing addressed to the Department of Buildings. The Superintendent of Buildings shall prepare a report of the finding of the inspection together with photographs, if appropriate. D. The rebuttable presumption standard set forth herein is met by the submission of any application, proposal and/or plan which satisfies the presumptions in § 437-2A and the building department shall not grant any building permit(s) for any such applications, proposals and/or plans. E. Nothing contained in this section shall preclude a finding of an illegal occupancy based upon direct evidence or other evidence.
Section 437-2 of Farmingdale, N.Y., Code of Ordinances ch. 437 establishes a set of rebuttable presumptions that courts and enforcement bodies may use in civil and criminal cases involving unpermitted residential occupancy. When certain physical or observable conditions exist — such as multiple utility meters, unapproved entrances, extra kitchens, excess bathrooms, multiple doorbells or mailboxes, or advertisements suggesting multi-family use — the law presumes that a dwelling is being used for more families than its permit allows. These presumptions are not automatic convictions; they can be challenged with conclusive evidence showing the conditions either do not exist or are actually code-compliant.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Operators of residential properties in Farmingdale should be aware that § 437-2 means that observable features of a property — including the number of utility meters, entrances, kitchens, bathrooms, doorbells, mailboxes, and even how a property is advertised — can trigger a legal presumption of illegal multi-family occupancy in enforcement proceedings. Compliant operators generally ensure that all entrances and structural configurations are reflected in approved plans on file with the Department of Buildings, and that utility connections and interior layouts match the dwelling's permitted use. Keeping records of approved building plans and ensuring that any advertising accurately reflects the permitted occupancy status of the property are practices consistent with compliance under this provision.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
Under § 437-2, tenants living in a dwelling that has been cited for unpermitted occupancy should understand that the law allows presumptions of illegal use to be raised based on physical conditions of the property — but those presumptions can be rebutted. A person charged under this chapter has the explicit right to request a written inspection by the Department of Buildings to challenge the presumption, as outlined in Subsection C. Tenants facing displacement or other consequences related to an illegal-occupancy finding may wish to consult a tenant-rights organization or legal aid service familiar with Farmingdale housing regulations to understand what options may be available.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated November 9, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References In
Rules and statutes that cite this regulation
Related Rules
Source Information
Use this in your app
Access this data programmatically via our API