Canandaigua, N.Y., Code of Ordinances ch. 748 § 748-27

Judicial review

In Force
Verified 11/7/2026 · Next check 12/7/2026
CanandaiguaInspections, Registration & Licensing

Operative Text

Canandaigua, N.Y., Code of Ordinances ch. 748 § 748-27
Any person or persons jointly or severally aggrieved by any final order of the Zoning Board of Appeals may seek to have such order reviewed by the Supreme Court in the manner prescribed by Article 78 of the Civil Practice Laws and Rules and as otherwise provided for in the laws of the State of New York.
Source: Legislative text reproduced verbatim
Plain English

Section 748-27 of Canandaigua's Code of Ordinances establishes that any individual or group harmed by a final decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals has the right to seek judicial review of that decision. The review is conducted by the New York Supreme Court under the procedures set out in Article 78 of the Civil Practice Laws and Rules, as well as any other applicable state law. This provision ensures that ZBA decisions are not entirely insulated from outside scrutiny and that an external legal check exists.

Written by anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 · Reviewed on November 7, 2026

Plain English — not legal advice.

For Property Managers

Under § 748-27, property owners and managers should be aware that a final Zoning Board of Appeals order—whether favorable or unfavorable to them—can be challenged in New York Supreme Court by any aggrieved party. Operators who receive a ZBA ruling that affects their property should document all proceedings and retain records of the board's final order, since those materials would be central to any Article 78 proceeding. Understanding that a ZBA decision may not be the last word helps compliant operators plan accordingly when making property or development decisions.

General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.

For Tenants

Section 748-27 gives tenants and other aggrieved parties a formal avenue to challenge a final Zoning Board of Appeals order by bringing an Article 78 proceeding in New York Supreme Court. If a ZBA decision affects housing conditions, land use, or other matters relevant to a tenancy, this provision confirms that the decision is subject to judicial scrutiny under state law. Tenants who believe a ZBA ruling has harmed them may wish to consult a tenant-rights organization or legal aid provider to understand whether and how an Article 78 review might apply to their circumstances.

General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.

Generated November 7, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.

Effective Timeline

Click on timeline segments to view historical versions.

References Out

No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.

References In

Rules and statutes that cite this regulation

Canandaigua Code § 748-14
Canandaigua Code § 748-3
Canandaigua Code § 748-29
Canandaigua Code § 748-14
Canandaigua Code § 748-30
Canandaigua Code § 748-20
Canandaigua Code § 748-14
Canandaigua Code § 748-29
Canandaigua Code § 748-31
Canandaigua Code § 748-32
Canandaigua Code § 748-14
Canandaigua Code § 748-37
Canandaigua Code § 748-35
Canandaigua Code § 748-14
Canandaigua Code § 748-14
Canandaigua Code § 748-37
Canandaigua Code § 748-39
Canandaigua Code § 748-6

Related Rules

§ 14.544
LICENSE REQUIREMENTS
§ 14.545
STANDARDS FOR HEALTH, SAFETY AND NUISANCE PREVENTION
§ 14.546
SANCTIONS AND PENALTIES

Source Information

Snapshot SHA:
Fetched:Nov 7, 2026, 09:55 AM UTC