Roseville, Minn., Code of Ordinances ch. 1202 § 1202.09
Penalty
Operative Text
(a) Violation of any provision of this chapter shall be a misdemeanor. (b) Any provisions of this chapter may be enforced by injunction or other appropriate civil remedy. (c) The city shall not issue a building permit in conjunction with reuse of manufactured home park property unless the park owner has paid reasonable relocation costs and the purchaser of the park has provided additional compensation in accordance with the requirements of this chapter. Approval of any application for rezoning, platting, conditional use permit, planned unit development or variance in conjunction with a park closing or conversion shall be conditional on compliance with the requirements of this chapter.
Under Roseville Code of Ordinances ch. 1202 § 1202.09, violating the manufactured home park relocation requirements is treated as a misdemeanor, and the city may also pursue civil remedies such as an injunction to enforce compliance. The city is prohibited from issuing building permits for redeveloped manufactured home park property unless the park owner has paid required relocation costs and the purchaser has provided any additional compensation the chapter mandates. Land-use approvals — including rezonings, plats, conditional use permits, planned unit developments, and variances — tied to a park closing or conversion are conditioned on full compliance with the chapter's requirements.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Roseville Code of Ordinances ch. 1202 § 1202.09 makes non-compliance a misdemeanor and opens the door to civil enforcement, including injunctions, so operators of manufactured home parks generally ensure all relocation cost obligations are satisfied before any redevelopment proceeds. A compliant park owner or purchaser documents payment of reasonable relocation costs and any additional required compensation prior to seeking building permits, because the city will not issue those permits without confirmation of compliance. Owners pursuing rezoning, platting, conditional use permits, planned unit developments, or variances in connection with a park closing or conversion should expect those approvals to be conditioned on meeting every requirement of the chapter.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
Roseville Code of Ordinances ch. 1202 § 1202.09 gives residents of manufactured home parks meaningful leverage: because violations are misdemeanors and the city cannot issue building permits or approve land-use applications without verified compliance, the relocation cost requirements carry real enforcement weight. Tenants who believe a park owner is proceeding with a closing or conversion without meeting the chapter's compensation requirements may have grounds to raise that non-compliance as part of any city permit or approval process. Consulting a tenant-rights organization or legal aid provider familiar with Minnesota manufactured home park law can help residents understand what remedies — including civil enforcement actions — may be available under this provision.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated November 13, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.
References In
No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.