Hopkins, Minn., Code of Ordinances ch. 26 § 26-125
Compliance required for permits, rezoning, platting, and variances
Operative Text
Approval of any application for a building permit, rezoning, platting, subdivision, conditional use permit, special use permit or variance in conjunction with a park closing shall be conditioned upon compliance with this article regarding payment of location costs and additional compensation having been satisfied.
Hopkins Code of Ordinances ch. 26 § 26-125 establishes that certain land-use approvals—including building permits, rezonings, plats, subdivisions, conditional use permits, special use permits, and variances—cannot be granted in connection with a manufactured home park closing unless the applicant has first satisfied the article's requirements for paying residents' relocation costs and additional compensation. The rule ties the approval process directly to financial obligations owed to displaced park residents. No permit or land-use entitlement moves forward until those obligations are met.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Under Hopkins Code of Ordinances ch. 26 § 26-125, operators or developers seeking any land-use approval tied to a park closing—whether a building permit, rezoning, variance, or similar entitlement—are generally expected to demonstrate full compliance with the article's relocation-cost and compensation requirements before any application can be approved. Compliant operators typically document that all required payments to displaced residents have been satisfied prior to submitting or advancing such applications. Keeping clear records of payments made under the article can help support a showing of compliance during the permitting review process.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
Hopkins Code of Ordinances ch. 26 § 26-125 gives residents of a closing manufactured home park a meaningful procedural protection: any developer or park owner seeking a building permit, rezoning, or similar approval connected to the park closing must first fulfill the article's relocation-cost and compensation obligations. If those obligations have not been met, residents or their advocates may be able to raise that noncompliance as a basis for objecting to a pending application before the relevant city body. Tenant-rights organizations familiar with Minnesota manufactured home park law can help residents understand what compensation is owed and what avenues exist for raising concerns during the approval process.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated November 13, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.
References In
No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.