Hopkins, Minn., Code of Ordinances ch. 20, art. III § 20-277
Burden of proof
Operative Text
A determination that the rental dwelling unit has been the location of disorderly behavior shall be made by a preponderance of the evidence. It shall not be necessary that criminal charges be brought in order to support a determination of disorderly behavior, nor shall the fact or dismissal or acquittal of such a criminal charge operate as a bar to adverse license action under this section.
Hopkins Code of Ordinances ch. 20, art. III § 20-277 establishes the evidentiary standard used when a rental dwelling unit is alleged to have been the site of disorderly behavior. Under this rule, a finding of disorderly behavior requires only a preponderance of the evidence — meaning it is more likely true than not — rather than the higher standard used in criminal proceedings. Critically, the rule also makes clear that the licensing process operates independently of the criminal justice system: neither the absence of criminal charges nor an acquittal or dismissal of such charges prevents authorities from taking adverse action against a rental license.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Property owners and managers operating under Hopkins Code of Ordinances ch. 20, art. III § 20-277 should understand that their rental license can face adverse action based on a civil evidentiary standard, entirely separate from any criminal proceedings involving the property. A compliant operator generally maintains thorough records of tenant communications, incident responses, and any steps taken to address behavioral concerns at the property, since those records can be relevant in a licensing proceeding. Because a criminal acquittal or dismissal does not shield a license from review under § 20-277, operators typically treat license compliance as a distinct and ongoing obligation from any parallel legal matters.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
Hopkins Code of Ordinances ch. 20, art. III § 20-277 affects tenants because adverse action against a rental license — which can impact housing stability — may proceed even if no criminal charges were filed, or if charges were dismissed or resulted in an acquittal. Tenants who believe a licensing action is being pursued unfairly or without sufficient evidence may have the opportunity to present their perspective during any administrative hearing process. Consulting a local tenant-rights organization or legal aid office can help tenants understand what procedural rights they may have in a licensing proceeding under this provision.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated November 13, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.
References In
No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.