Detroit — Ch. 22 Art. X Right to Counsel in Eviction Proceedings § 22-10-9
No private right of action, debt, or obligation created
Operative Text
(a) Nothing in this article, or the Administration or application thereof, shall be construed to create a private right of action on the part of any person or entity against the City or any agency, official, or employee thereof. (b) Nothing in this article, or the application thereof, shall be construed to create a debt or obligation of the City to any covered individual. (c) Nothing in this article, or the application thereof, shall be construed to create a debt or obligation of the City, other than a contractual debt or obligation, to any designated organization.
Detroit — Ch. 22 Art. X Right to Counsel in Eviction Proceedings § 22-10-9 establishes that the Right to Counsel article does not create any private right of action against the City of Detroit, its agencies, officials, or employees. It also clarifies that the article does not generate a financial debt or legal obligation from the City to individuals covered by the program, except for contractual obligations owed to designated organizations. In short, the article defines the scope of legal remedies available under the program without expanding the City's liability.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Under Detroit — Ch. 22 Art. X Right to Counsel in Eviction Proceedings § 22-10-9, property owners and managers should understand that this provision limits the legal exposure of the City itself, not of landlords. Compliant operators generally stay informed about the broader Right to Counsel framework to understand how it may affect eviction proceedings, even though this particular section addresses governmental liability. Awareness of these boundaries helps operators understand the legal landscape in which eviction cases are conducted in Detroit.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
Detroit — Ch. 22 Art. X Right to Counsel in Eviction Proceedings § 22-10-9 makes clear that the Right to Counsel article cannot be used as a basis to sue the City of Detroit or its officials for failing to fulfill the program's goals. This means that while the article establishes a framework for legal representation in eviction proceedings, it does not give covered individuals a direct legal claim against the City if services fall short. Tenants seeking to understand their rights under the broader Right to Counsel program may wish to consult a tenant-rights organization or legal aid provider for guidance on available remedies.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated October 13, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.
References In
No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.