Phoenix — Ch. 22 Art. VI Property Maintenance § 22-394
Notice
Operative Text
Whenever the commissioner of buildings, the superintendent of police or other authorized representative of the village reasonably believes that any premises constitutes a public nuisance as described in this division, he may give written notice to the person who owns or controls the premises stating that a nuisance exists and identifying reasonable abatement measures that must be taken within 30 days of the notice. The notice shall be in writing and may be served in person or sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. The notice shall provide the recipient a reasonable opportunity to meet with a representative of the village to discuss allegations in the notice and the need for abatement measures.
Under Phoenix Ch. 22 Art. VI § 22-394, when an authorized village official—such as the commissioner of buildings or superintendent of police—reasonably believes a property constitutes a public nuisance, they may issue a formal written notice to the owner or person in control of that property. The notice must identify the nuisance and specify abatement measures that must be completed within 30 days. It must also offer the recipient a chance to meet with a village representative to discuss the allegations before or during the abatement process.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Under § 22-394, a compliant property owner or manager who receives a written nuisance notice from the village takes care to review the identified abatement measures and note the 30-day compliance window. Operators generally take advantage of the provision's built-in opportunity to meet with a village representative to clarify expectations and discuss the scope of required corrective action. Keeping records of all correspondence, including certified mail receipts and any meeting notes, is a practice commonly associated with demonstrating good-faith compliance.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
Section 22-394 establishes a formal notice process that village officials must follow when declaring a property a public nuisance, which can be relevant to tenants living on affected premises. If you are aware that your landlord has received such a notice, tenant-rights organizations in the Phoenix area can help you understand how the 30-day abatement timeline and the right-to-meet provision may affect your housing situation. Tenants may also raise the existence of an unaddressed nuisance notice as relevant context when pursuing other housing remedies available under local or state law.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated November 10, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.
References In
No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.