Park Forest — Ch. 54 Human Relations § 54-238

Exemptions

In Force
Verified 11/10/2026 · Next check 12/10/2026
Park ForestFair Housing & Anti-Discrimination

Operative Text

Park Forest — Ch. 54 Human Relations § 54-238
(a) Nothing contained in this article shall prohibit an employer, employment agency or labor organization from:
(1) Bona fide qualification. Hiring or selecting between persons for bona fide occupational qualifications or any reason except those civil-rights violations specifically identified in this article.
(2) Veterans. Giving preferential treatment to veterans and their relatives as required by the laws or regulations of the United States or this state or a unit of local government.
(3) Unfavorable discharge from military service. Using unfavorable discharge from military service as a valid employment criterion when authorized by federal law or regulation or when a position of employment involves the exercise of fiduciary responsibilities as defined by rules and regulations which the state's department of human rights shall adopt.
(4) Ability tests. Giving or acting upon the results of any professionally developed ability test provided that such test, its administration, or action upon the results, is not used as subterfuge for or does not have the effect of unlawful discrimination.
(5) Training and apprenticeship programs. Establishing an educational requirement as a prerequisite to selection for a training or apprenticeship program, provided such requirement does not operate to discriminate on the basis of any prohibited classification except age.
(6) Citizenship status. Making legitimate distinctions based on citizenship status if specifically authorized or required by state or federal law.
(b) For purposes of this article, the term "handicap" shall not include any employee or applicant who is currently engaging in the illegal use of drugs, when an employer acts on the basis of such use. This subsection shall not apply where an employee or applicant for employment:
(1) Has successfully completed a supervised drug rehabilitation program and is no longer engaging in the illegal use of drugs, or has otherwise been rehabilitated successfully and is no longer engaging in such use;
(2) Is participating in a supervised rehabilitation program and is no longer engaging in such use; or
(3) Is erroneously regarded as engaging in such use, but is not engaging in such use.
It shall not be a violation of this article for an employer to adopt or administer reasonable policies or procedures, including, but not limited to drug testing, designed to ensure that an individual described in subsections (b)(1) or (2) of this section is no longer engaging in the illegal use of drugs.
(c) An employer may:
(1) Prohibit the illegal use of drugs and the use of alcohol at the workplace by all employees;
(2) Require that employees shall not be under the influence of alcohol or be engaging in the illegal use of drugs at the workplace;
(3) Require that employees behave in conformance with the requirements established under the Federal Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (11 USC 701 et seq.) and the Drug Free Workplace Act (30 ILCS 580/1 et seq.);
(4) Hold an employee who engages in the illegal use of drugs or who is an alcoholic to the same qualification standards for employment or job performance and behavior that such employer holds other employees, even if any unsatisfactory performance or behavior is related to the drug use or alcoholism of such employee; and
(5) With respect to federal regulations regarding alcohol and the illegal use of drugs, require that employees comply with:
a. The standards established in such regulations of the United States Department of Defense, if the employees of the employer are employed in an industry subject to such regulations, including complying with regulations, if any, that apply to employment in sensitive positions in such an industry, in the case of employees of the employer who are employed in such positions, as defined in the regulations of the United States Department of Defense;
b. The standards established in such regulations of the nuclear regulatory commission, if the employees of the employer are employed in an industry subject to such regulations, including complying with regulations, if any, that apply to employment in sensitive positions in such an industry, in the case of employees of the employer who are employed in such positions, as defined in the regulations of the nuclear regulatory commission; and
c. The standards established in such regulations of the United States Department of Transportation, if the employees of the employer are employed in a transportation industry subject to such regulations, including complying with such regulations, if any, that apply to employment in sensitive positions in such an industry, in the case of employees of the employer who are employed in such positions, as defined in the regulations of the United States Department of Transportation.
(d) For purposes of this article, a test to determine the illegal use of drugs shall not be considered a medical examination. Nothing in this article shall be construed to encourage, prohibit, or authorize the conducting of drug testing for the illegal use of drugs by job applicants or employees or making employment decisions based on such test results.
(e) Nothing in this article shall be construed to encourage, prohibit, restrict or authorize the otherwise lawful exercise by an employer subject to the jurisdiction of the United States Department of Transportation of authority to:
(1) Test employees of such employer in, and applicants for, positions involving safety-sensitive duties for the illegal use of drugs and for on-duty impairment by alcohol; and
(2) Remove such persons who test positive for illegal use of drugs and on-duty impairment by alcohol pursuant to subsection (e)(1) of this section from safety-sensitive duties in implementing subsection (c) of this section.
Source: Legislative text reproduced verbatim
Plain English

Park Forest Ch. 54 Human Relations § 54-238 carves out a set of circumstances under which employment decisions that might otherwise raise civil-rights concerns are expressly permitted. These exemptions cover areas such as bona fide occupational qualifications, veterans' preferences required by law, professionally developed ability tests, educational prerequisites for apprenticeship programs, and citizenship distinctions authorized by law. The provision also clarifies how the term 'handicap' interacts with current illegal drug use, and preserves employer authority to enforce drug- and alcohol-free workplace policies consistent with federal frameworks like the Drug-Free Workplace Act and Department of Transportation regulations.

Written by anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 · Reviewed on November 9, 2026

Plain English — not legal advice.

For Property Managers

Although § 54-238 is an employment-focused provision rather than a landlord-tenant rule, property owners who also act as employers — such as those who hire on-site managers or maintenance staff — should be aware that this section identifies the limited circumstances under which employment distinctions are lawful under Ch. 54. Compliant operators generally ensure that any ability tests, educational prerequisites, or drug-and-alcohol policies they apply are genuinely job-related, non-pretextual, and consistent with the federal and state frameworks referenced in § 54-238. Maintaining clear written policies that align with the Drug-Free Workplace Act and applicable federal agency regulations helps demonstrate that employment decisions fall within the recognized exemptions.

General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.

For Tenants

For individuals who are job applicants or employees in Park Forest, § 54-238 defines the boundaries of lawful employer conduct under the Human Relations article — meaning that actions falling outside these exemptions may still constitute prohibited discrimination. Notably, the provision protects people who have successfully completed or are actively participating in a supervised drug rehabilitation program from being excluded from the article's 'handicap' protections solely on the basis of past illegal drug use. Those who believe an employer has invoked one of these exemptions improperly as a pretext for discrimination may wish to consult a tenant-rights or workers'-rights organization, or explore filing a complaint with the appropriate state or local human rights body.

General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.

Generated November 9, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.

Effective Timeline

Click on timeline segments to view historical versions.

References Out

Rules and statutes cited by this regulation

30 ILCS 580
Not yet ingested

References In

Rules and statutes that cite this regulation

IL Muni § 54-65
IL Muni § 54-71
IL Muni § 54-68
IL Muni § 54-239
IL Muni § 54-116

Related Rules

§ 5.106
§ 5.106 Equal access in accordance with the individual's gender identity in community planning and development programs.
§ 5.109
§ 5.109 Equal participation of faith-based organizations in HUD programs and activities.
§ 2
Policies; recommendations

Source Information

Snapshot SHA:
Fetched:Nov 9, 2026, 09:50 PM UTC