S.F. Admin. Code ch. 37 § 37.8A

Expedited Hearing Procedures (San Francisco Rent Ordinance)

In Force
Verified 5/26/2026 · Next check 8/24/2026
effective 1/20/2020San FranciscoRent Regulation

Operative Text

S.F. Admin. Code ch. 37 § 37.8A
As an alternative to the hearing procedures set forth in Sections 37.7(g) and 37.8(e)

above, a landlord or tenant may, in certain cases, obtain an expedited hearing and final order

with the written consent of all parties. This section contains the exclusive grounds and

procedures for such hearings.

     (a) Applicability. A tenant or landlord may seek an expedited hearing for the following

petitions only:

                (1) Any landlord capital improvement petition where the proposed increase for

certified capital improvement costs does not exceed the greater of 10% or $30.00 of a tenant's

base rent and the parties stipulate to the cost of the capital improvements;

                (2) Any tenant petition alleging decreased housing services with a past value not

exceeding $1,000.00 as of the date the petition is filed;

                (3) Any tenant petition alleging the landlord's failure to repair and maintain the

premises as required by state or local law;

                (4) Any tenant petition alleging unlawful rent increases where the parties stipulate

to the tenant's rent history and the rent overpayments do not exceed a total of $1,000.00 as of

the date the petition is filed;

                (5) Any petition concerning jurisdictional questions where the parties stipulate to

the relevant facts.

     (b) Hearing Procedures. The petition application procedures of Sections 37.7(f) and

Section 37.8(c) and (d) apply to petitions for expedited hearings. The hearings shall be

conducted according to the following procedures:

                (1) Time of Hearing. The hearing must be held within twenty-one (21) days of

the filing of the written consent of all the parties. The level of housing services provided to

tenants' rental units shall not be decreased during the period between the filing of the petition

and the conclusion of the hearing.

                (2) Consolidation. To the greatest extent possible, and only with the consent of

the parties, hearings with respect to a given building shall be consolidated.

                (3) Conduct of Hearing. The hearing shall be conducted by an Administrative

Law Judge designated by the Board. Both parties may offer such documents, testimony, written

declarations or other evidence as may be pertinent to the proceedings. Stipulations of the

parties as required under Sections 37.8A(b)(1), (b)(4) and (b)(5) shall be required as evidence.

Burden of proof requirements set forth in Section 37.7 and 37.8 are applicable to the hearing

categories in Section 37.8A(b) above. No record of the hearing shall be maintained for any

purpose.

                (4) Order of the Administrative Law Judge. Based upon all criteria set forth in

Section 37.7(4) and 37.8(e)(4) governing the petition, the Administrative Law Judge shall make a

written order no later than ten (10) days after the hearing. The Administrative Law Judge shall

make no findings of fact. The Administrative Law Judge shall order payment or refund of

amounts owing to a party or parties, if amounts are owed, within a period of time not to exceed

forty-five (45) days.

                (5) Stay of Order. The Administrative Law Judge's order shall be stayed for

fifteen (15) days from the date of issuance. During this period, either party may lodge a written

objection to the order with the Board. If the Board receives such objection within this period, the

order is automatically dissolved and the petitioning party may refile the petition for hearing under

any other appropriate hearing procedure set forth in this chapter.

                (6) Finality of Administrative Law Judge's Order. If no objection to the

Administrative Law Judge's order is made pursuant to Subsection (c)(5) above, the order

become final. The order is not subject to appeal to the Board under Section 37.8(f) nor is it

subject to judicial review pursuant to Section 37.8(f)(9).
Source: Legislative text reproduced verbatim
Plain English

San Francisco Rent Ordinance § 37.8A establishes an expedited hearing track at the Rent Board that landlords and tenants can use together, by mutual written consent, for a defined set of smaller or stipulated disputes. Eligible matters include modest capital improvement petitions, decreased-services claims under $1,000, failure-to-maintain complaints, small unlawful-rent-increase cases, and jurisdictional questions where facts are agreed upon. A hearing must occur within 21 days, and the Administrative Law Judge issues a written order within 10 days after the hearing—though either party may dissolve that order by filing a written objection within 15 days, after which the case returns to standard procedures.

Written by anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 · Reviewed on September 5, 2026

Plain English — not legal advice.

For Property Managers

Under § 37.8A, operators who agree with a tenant to use the expedited track generally ensure that all required stipulations are prepared before the hearing, that housing services are not reduced between petition filing and hearing conclusion, and that any payment or refund ordered is completed within the 45-day window specified. Compliant operators also remain aware that lodging a written objection within the 15-day stay period dissolves the order entirely, returning the matter to standard hearing procedures.

General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.

For Tenants

Section 37.8A gives tenants an option to resolve certain smaller disputes—such as decreased housing services or unlawful rent increases under $1,000—more quickly, but only if the landlord also consents in writing. If an order is issued and a tenant believes it is incorrect, filing a written objection with the Rent Board within the 15-day stay period dissolves the order; however, a final order under § 37.8A cannot be appealed to the Board or reviewed by a court. Tenants can contact the San Francisco Rent Board or a local tenant-rights organization to understand whether this track fits their situation.

General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.

Generated September 5, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.

Effective Timeline

Current
Jan 20, 2020
Click on timeline segments to view historical versions.

References Out

No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.

References In

No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.

Related Rules

§ 306
Service of notices and orders
§ 307
Records and searches
§ 325
Review boards

Source Information